147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36893842)
1. Intravascular imaging modalities in coronary intervention: Insights from 3D-printed phantom coronary models.
Oliveira C; Brito J; Rodrigues T; Santiago H; Ricardo D; Cardoso P; Pinto FJ; Silva Marques J
Rev Port Cardiol; 2023 Jul; 42(7):629-639. PubMed ID: 36893842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reciprocal assistance of intravascular imaging in three-dimensional stent reconstruction: Using cross-modal translation based on disentanglement representation.
Wu P; Qiao Y; Chu M; Zhang S; Bai J; Gutierrez-Chico JL; Tu S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2023 Mar; 104():102166. PubMed ID: 36586195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound or angiography guidance for distal left main coronary stenting. The ROCK cohort II study.
Cortese B; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Lanocha M; Ielasi A; Giannini F; Campo G; D'Ascenzo F; Latini RA; Krestianinov O; Alfonso F; Trani C; Prati F; Linares JA; Sardella G; Wlodarczak A; Viganò E; Camarero TG; Stella P; Sozykin A; Fineschi M; Burzotta F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 34582631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main coronary artery.
Miura K; Tada T; Shimada T; Ohya M; Murai R; Kubo S; Tanaka H; Fuku Y; Goto T; Kadota K
Heart Vessels; 2021 May; 36(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 33389063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
Akl E; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mehta SR; Dan K; Kuku KO; Courtney BK; Sheth T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.
Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography.
Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
