139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36894415)
1. Factors influencing suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision following breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ.
Dhak S; Baliski C; Bakos B
Am J Surg; 2023 May; 225(5):866-870. PubMed ID: 36894415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital.
Jones V; Linebarger J; Perez S; Gabram S; Okoli J; Bumpers H; Burns B; Mosunjac M; Rizzo M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 26254169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?
Fauveau LR; Dao TN; Wallace LB; Mamawala MK; Obaid A; Waddimba AC; Grant MD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):215-220. PubMed ID: 37027122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery?
Mamtani A; Romanoff A; Baser R; Vincent A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 32500343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Breast-Conserving Surgery Re-excision on Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the BREAST-Q.
Matar-Ujvary R; Haglich K; Flanagan MR; Fuzesi S; Sevilimedu V; Nelson JA; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Sep; 30(9):5341-5349. PubMed ID: 37306849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: A large retrospective study from a single institution.
Miligy IM; Toss MS; Khout H; Whisker L; Burrell HC; Ellis IO; Green AR; Macmillan D; Rakha EA
Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1143-1153. PubMed ID: 31318120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative Pathologic Margin Analysis and Re-Excision to Minimize Reoperation for Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Racz JM; Glasgow AE; Keeney GL; Degnim AC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Cheville JC; Habermann EB; Boughey JC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 27(13):5303-5311. PubMed ID: 32623609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.
Lai HW; Huang RH; Wu YT; Chen CJ; Chen ST; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lee CW; Wu HK; Lin HY; Kuo SJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1725-1735. PubMed ID: 30120037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
