247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36894603)
1. Determining the most accurate 16S rRNA hypervariable region for taxonomic identification from respiratory samples.
López-Aladid R; Fernández-Barat L; Alcaraz-Serrano V; Bueno-Freire L; Vázquez N; Pastor-Ibáñez R; Palomeque A; Oscanoa P; Torres A
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3974. PubMed ID: 36894603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
Abellan-Schneyder I; Matchado MS; Reitmeier S; Sommer A; Sewald Z; Baumbach J; List M; Neuhaus K
mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.
Alcon-Giner C; Caim S; Mitra S; Ketskemety J; Wegmann U; Wain J; Belteki G; Clarke P; Hall LJ
BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 29096601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA for taxonomic profiling of vaginal microbiota using next-generation sequencing.
Sirichoat A; Sankuntaw N; Engchanil C; Buppasiri P; Faksri K; Namwat W; Chantratita W; Lulitanond V
Arch Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 203(3):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 33221964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of an Analysis Pipeline Characterizing Multiple Hypervariable Regions of 16S rRNA Using Mock Samples.
Barb JJ; Oler AJ; Kim HS; Chalmers N; Wallen GR; Cashion A; Munson PJ; Ames NJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148047. PubMed ID: 26829716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An accurate and efficient experimental approach for characterization of the complex oral microbiota.
Zheng W; Tsompana M; Ruscitto A; Sharma A; Genco R; Sun Y; Buck MJ
Microbiome; 2015 Oct; 3():48. PubMed ID: 26437933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Analysis of Primers Used for 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Oral Microbiome Studies.
Na HS; Song Y; Yu Y; Chung J
Methods Protoc; 2023 Aug; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 37623922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sediment-associated bacterial community and predictive functionalities are influenced by choice of 16S ribosomal RNA hypervariable region(s): An amplicon-based diversity study.
Rajeev M; Sushmitha TJ; Toleti SR; Pandian SK
Genomics; 2020 Nov; 112(6):4968-4979. PubMed ID: 32911024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing.
Ogier JC; Pagès S; Galan M; Barret M; Gaudriault S
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 31357928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing by PacBio improves taxonomic resolution in human microbiome samples.
Buetas E; Jordán-López M; López-Roldán A; D'Auria G; Martínez-Priego L; De Marco G; Carda-Diéguez M; Mira A
BMC Genomics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):310. PubMed ID: 38528457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primer Design for an Accurate View of Picocyanobacterial Community Structure by Using High-Throughput Sequencing.
Huber P; Cornejo-Castillo FM; Ferrera I; Sánchez P; Logares R; Metz S; Balagué V; Acinas SG; Gasol JM; Unrein F
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 85(7):. PubMed ID: 30709827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
Angebault C; Payen M; Woerther PL; Rodriguez C; Botterel F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232215. PubMed ID: 32343737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GSR-DB: a manually curated and optimized taxonomical database for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis.
Molano L-AG; Vega-Abellaneda S; Manichanh C
mSystems; 2024 Feb; 9(2):e0095023. PubMed ID: 38189256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of iSeq and MiSeq as the two platforms for 16S rRNA sequencing in the study of the gut of rat microbiome.
Salamon D; Zapała B; Krawczyk A; Potasiewicz A; Nikiforuk A; Stój A; Gosiewski T
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Nov; 106(22):7671-7681. PubMed ID: 36322250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the effect of smoking on the buccal microbiome using next-generation sequencing technology.
Karabudak S; Ari O; Durmaz B; Dal T; Basyigit T; Kalcioglu MT; Durmaz R
J Med Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 68(8):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 31199220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria.
Chakravorty S; Helb D; Burday M; Connell N; Alland D
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 May; 69(2):330-9. PubMed ID: 17391789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring protocol bias in airway microbiome studies: one versus two PCR steps and 16S rRNA gene region V3 V4 versus V4.
Drengenes C; Eagan TML; Haaland I; Wiker HG; Nielsen R
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):3. PubMed ID: 33397283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using two next-generation sequencing technologies for phylogenetic analysis of the rumen bacterial community in steers.
Myer PR; Kim M; Freetly HC; Smith TPL
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():132-140. PubMed ID: 27282101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
