These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

668 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36895012)

  • 1. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
    Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Song Z; Zhang Z; Zheng J; Zhang K; Wang F; Ran M; Luo J
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4320. PubMed ID: 38383595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].
    Pu XY; Luo WY; Gao MX; Ma GF; Zhang C; Chi F; Qian YW
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 May; 35(5):409-17. PubMed ID: 35535527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Chen X; Wu LL; Yang ZC; Qiu YJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 37211931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ali EMS; Abdeen M; Saleh MK
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Sep; 166(1):365. PubMed ID: 39264454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and short-segment fusion in the treatment of elderly degenerative lumbar scoliosis with spinal stenosis.
    Li P; Tong Y; Chen Y; Zhang Z; Song Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Oct; 22(1):906. PubMed ID: 34711184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion verse 3D microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 24-month follow-up.
    Guo W; Li T; Feng C; Yu Y; Hu Y; Fan X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 38066527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.
    Wang L; Li C; Wang Z; Li D; Tian Y; Yuan S; Liu X
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):473-485. PubMed ID: 35788970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ge M; Zhang Y; Ying H; Feng C; Li Y; Tian J; Zhao T; Shao H; Huang Y
    Int Orthop; 2022 Sep; 46(9):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 35723702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.