195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36895122)
21. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.
Davenport C; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks JJ; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Champaneria R; Bayliss SE; Snell KI; Sundar S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD011964. PubMed ID: 35879201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of performance between O-RADS, IOTA simple rules risk assessment and ADNEX model in the discrimination of ovarian Brenner tumors.
Shang J; Lei T; Wu L; Lin M; Xie H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 308(3):961-970. PubMed ID: 37186266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.
Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Yang Y; Ju H; Huang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110926. PubMed ID: 37418798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. O-RADS Classification for Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Masses: Agreement between IOTA Lexicon and ADNEX Model for Assigning Risk Group.
Vara J; Pagliuca M; Springer S; Gonzalez de Canales J; Brotons I; Yakcich J; Ajossa S; Pascual MA; Guerriero S; Alcazar JL
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36832161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China.
He P; Wang JJ; Duan W; Song C; Yang Y; Wu QQ
J Ovarian Res; 2021 Dec; 14(1):169. PubMed ID: 34857005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cui L; Xu H; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 34217614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. O-RADS MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Category-wise Malignancy Rates.
Rizzo S; Cozzi A; Dolciami M; Del Grande F; Scarano AL; Papadia A; Gui B; Gandolfo N; Catalano C; Manganaro L
Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220795. PubMed ID: 36413127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses.
Qian L; Du Q; Jiang M; Yuan F; Chen H; Feng W
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():673722. PubMed ID: 34141619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment.
Jeong SY; Park BK; Lee YY; Kim TJ
J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32604883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Bourne T; Ajossa S; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Czekierdowski A; Savelli L; Van Huffel S; Valentin L; Timmerman D
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 18(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 22114135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort.
Landolfo C; Bourne T; Froyman W; Van Calster B; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Wynants L; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Czekierdowski A; Kaijser J; Coosemans A; Scambia G; Vergote I; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 61(2):231-242. PubMed ID: 36178788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.
Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simple rules, O-RADS, ADNEX and SRR model: Single oncologic center validation of diagnostic predictive models alone and combined (two-step strategy) to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses and ovarian tumors.
Spagnol G; Marchetti M; De Tommasi O; Vitagliano A; Cavallin F; Tozzi R; Saccardi C; Noventa M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Oct; 177():109-116. PubMed ID: 37660412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
Pelayo M; Pelayo-Delgado I; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Corraliza-Galán V; Martin-Gromaz C; Pablos-Antona MJ; Zurita-Calvo J; Alcázar JL
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
