151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36896057)
1. Application of Anatomically Designed 2-Dimensional V Plate in Management of Mandible Fracture: A Pilot Study.
Bhagat MJA; Durairaj D; Naganathan V; Nathiya B; Kumar GS; Mariam S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2022 Dec; 21(4):1363-1368. PubMed ID: 36896057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of a single 2.0-mm AO locking reconstruction plate with conventional miniplate osteosynthesis for treatment of linear non-comminuted fractures of symphysis and parasymphsis region of the mandible.
Hu W; Agrawal M; Thadani S; Mukul SK; Sood R; Patel A; Dhanak R; Tailor S
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 120(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 30739640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of labial versus labio-inferior lines of osteosynthesis using 3D miniplate for fractures of anterior mandible: A finite element analysis with a pilot clinical trial.
Ponvel K; Panneerselvam E; Balasubramanian S; Krishna Kumar Raja VB
Chin J Traumatol; 2019 Oct; 22(5):261-269. PubMed ID: 31493976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible.
Vashistha A; Singh M; Chaudhary M; Agarwal N; Kaur G
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28316921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two L shaped Plate on Plate Versus Single Conventional L Miniplate in Fixation of Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures.
Pappachan B; Agrawal R
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Sep; 18(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 31371888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of a multidirectional locking plate and conventional plates for the osteosynthesis of mandibular angle fractures-A preliminary study.
Zimmermann C; Henningsen A; Henkel KO; Klatt J; Jürgens C; Seide K; Kienast B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 45(12):1913-1920. PubMed ID: 29037919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.
Aggarwal S; Singh M; Modi P; Walia E; Aggarwal R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 28785906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two miniplates versus 3-dimensional plate in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a retrospective analysis.
Rai A; Jain A; Thukral R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Dec; 25(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 33432472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Study of Miniplate vs Reconstruction Plate in the Management of Bilateral Parasymphysis Mandible Fracture: FEM Analysis.
Kurakar M; Joshi U
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Mar; 22(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 36703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3D and Standard Miniplates in Treatment of Mandibular Symphysis and Parasymphysis Fractures.
Agarwal M; Meena B; Gupta DK; Tiwari AD; Jakhar SK
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Jun; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 24821994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel design of miniplate for fixation of fractures at transition zone of parasymphysis-body region of mandible - A clinical randomised study.
Datarkar A; Tayal S; Galie M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1551-1556. PubMed ID: 31383537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An In Vitro Evaluation of a Novel Design
Kende PP; Wadewale M; Ranganath S; Desai H; Landge JS; Sarda A
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2022 Sep; 21(3):929-935. PubMed ID: 36274868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle].
Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single Versus Two Plate Osteosynthesis for Parasymphysis Fractures of the Mandible: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Padmanaban K; Duraisamy D; Rajiah D; Raghavan P; Annamalai S
Cureus; 2023 Feb; 15(2):e35311. PubMed ID: 36968908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixation of subcondylar fractures of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial comparing one trapezoidal plate with two miniplates.
Adhikari M; Bhatt K; Yadav R; Mandal J; Bhutia O; Roychoudhury A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 50(6):756-762. PubMed ID: 33280989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.
Madsen MJ; McDaniel CA; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18848096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single linear miniplate versus rectangular grid plate in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A prospective, clinico-radiographic, comparative study.
Das MK; Mishra M; Singh G; Mondal S
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 37273441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a single 2.0-mm locking AO reconstruction titanium plate in linear, non-comminuted, mandible fractures.
Parmar BS; Makwana KG; Patel AM; Tandel RC; Shah J
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 4(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 24987599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis and internal locking miniplate osteosynthesis.
Kumar S; Gattumeedhi SR; Sankhla B; Garg A; Ingle E; Dagli N
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2014 Nov; 4(Suppl 1):S26-31. PubMed ID: 25452924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
