152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36896642)
1. A Bayesian zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model for multivariate compositional count data.
Koslovsky MD
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 36896642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian variable selection for multivariate zero-inflated models: Application to microbiome count data.
Lee KH; Coull BA; Moscicki AB; Paster BJ; Starr JR
Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):499-517. PubMed ID: 30590511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate zero-inflated regression for count data: a Bayesian approach with application to plant counts.
Majumdar A; Gries C
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 27. PubMed ID: 21969981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian joint model for compositional mediation effect selection in microbiome data.
Fu J; Koslovsky MD; Neophytou AM; Vannucci M
Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(17):2999-3015. PubMed ID: 37173609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian biclustering for microbial metagenomic sequencing data via multinomial matrix factorization.
Zhou F; He K; Li Q; Chapkin RS; Ni Y
Biostatistics; 2022 Jul; 23(3):891-909. PubMed ID: 33634824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transformation and differential abundance analysis of microbiome data incorporating phylogeny.
Zhou C; Zhao H; Wang T
Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 37(24):4652-4660. PubMed ID: 34302462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian compositional regression with structured priors for microbiome feature selection.
Zhang L; Shi Y; Jenq RR; Do KA; Peterson CB
Biometrics; 2021 Sep; 77(3):824-838. PubMed ID: 32686846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zero-inflated generalized Dirichlet multinomial regression model for microbiome compositional data analysis.
Tang ZZ; Chen G
Biostatistics; 2019 Oct; 20(4):698-713. PubMed ID: 29939212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrative Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial regression model for the analysis of taxonomic abundances in microbiome data.
Wadsworth WD; Argiento R; Guindani M; Galloway-Pena J; Shelburne SA; Vannucci M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):94. PubMed ID: 28178947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analyzing the overall effects of the microbiome abundance data with a Bayesian predictive value approach.
Zhang X; Yi N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):1992-2003. PubMed ID: 35695247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginalized multilevel hurdle and zero-inflated models for overdispersed and correlated count data with excess zeros.
Kassahun W; Neyens T; Molenberghs G; Faes C; Verbeke G
Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4402-19. PubMed ID: 24957791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling of zero-inflation improves inference of metagenomic gene count data.
Jonsson V; Österlund T; Nerman O; Kristiansson E
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3712-3728. PubMed ID: 30474490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment and Selection of Competing Models for Zero-Inflated Microbiome Data.
Xu L; Paterson AD; Turpin W; Xu W
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129606. PubMed ID: 26148172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of statistical methods for modeling count data with an application to hospital length of stay.
Fernandez GA; Vatcheva KP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):211. PubMed ID: 35927612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zero-inflated Poisson models with measurement error in the response.
Zhang Q; Yi GY
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 35261029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stochastic variational variable selection for high-dimensional microbiome data.
Dang T; Kumaishi K; Usui E; Kobori S; Sato T; Toda Y; Yamasaki Y; Tsujimoto H; Ichihashi Y; Iwata H
Microbiome; 2022 Dec; 10(1):236. PubMed ID: 36566203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On performance of parametric and distribution-free models for zero-inflated and over-dispersed count responses.
Tang W; Lu N; Chen T; Wang W; Gunzler DD; Han Y; Tu XM
Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(24):3235-45. PubMed ID: 26078035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing latent classes in gut microbiome data using generalized Poisson regression models.
Qiao X; He H; Sun L; Bai S; Ye P
Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):102-124. PubMed ID: 37921025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HARMONIES: A Hybrid Approach for Microbiome Networks Inference via Exploiting Sparsity.
Jiang S; Xiao G; Koh AY; Chen Y; Yao B; Li Q; Zhan X
Front Genet; 2020; 11():445. PubMed ID: 32582274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian approach for analyzing zero-inflated clustered count data with dispersion.
Choo-Wosoba H; Gaskins J; Levy S; Datta S
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):801-812. PubMed ID: 29108124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
