BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36897054)

  • 1. Optimising cylinder model dimensions for VARSKIN to simulate a droplet of radionuclide skin contamination using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.
    James G; O'Brien J; Thomson B
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 May; 44(5):366-374. PubMed ID: 36897054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the photon dose calculation model in the VARSKIN 4 skin dose computer code.
    Sherbini S; Decicco J; Struckmeyer R; Saba M; Bush-Goddard S
    Health Phys; 2012 Dec; 103(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23111523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of the VARSKIN beta skin dose calculation computer code.
    Sherbini S; DeCicco J; Gray AT; Struckmeyer R
    Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 18469586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of skin absorbed doses during manipulation of radioactive sources: a comparison between the VARSKIN code and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Amato E; Italiano A
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 29235449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo calculation and silicon detector measurement of the hot particle dose.
    Chung MH; Levine SH; Jester WA
    Health Phys; 1991 Dec; 61(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 1955329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new VARSKIN 4 photon skin dosimetry model.
    Hamby DM; Lodwick CJ; Palmer TS; Reese SR; Higley KA; Caffrey JA; Sherbini S; Saba M; Bush-Goddard SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 23070483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PERFORMANCE OF THE VARSKIN 5 (v5.3) ELECTRON DOSIMETRY MODEL.
    Anspach LJ; Hamby DM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29378064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skin dose contamination conversion coefficients. Benchmark with three simulation codes.
    Frosio T; Bertreix P; Menaa N; Thomas S; Eberhardt H; Endres J
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jan; 42(1):. PubMed ID: 34801994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A COMPARISON OF BETA SKIN DOSES CALCULATED WITH VARSKIN 5.35.3 AND MCNP5.
    Dubeau J; Hakmana Witharana SS; Sun J; Heinmiller BE; Chase WJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 30053277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin dose from radionuclide contamination on clothing.
    Taylor DC; Hussein EM; Yuen PS
    Health Phys; 1997 Jun; 72(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 9169925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of electron dose-point kernels in water generated by the Monte Carlo codes, PENELOPE, GEANT4, MCNPX, and ETRAN.
    Uusijärvi H; Chouin N; Bernhardt P; Ferrer L; Bardiès M; Forssell-Aronsson E
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2009 Aug; 24(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 19694581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo dosimetry of CSA1 and CSA2 137Cs brachytherapy source models.
    Selvam TP; Sahoo S; Vishwakarma RS
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3870-9. PubMed ID: 19810459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the contamination droplet model used for the assessment of skin dose during the manipulation of radiopharmaceuticals.
    Wicks S; Heraghty N
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Oct; 43(4):. PubMed ID: 37827133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
    Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of cellular S-values using Geant4-DNA: The effect of cell geometry.
    Šefl M; Incerti S; Papamichael G; Emfietzoglou D
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Oct; 104():113-23. PubMed ID: 26159660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation protection from external exposure to radionuclides: A Monte Carlo data handbook.
    Amato E; Italiano A; Auditore L; Baldari S
    Phys Med; 2018 Feb; 46():160-167. PubMed ID: 29519404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of microdosimetric spectra for protons using Geant4-DNA and a
    Mokari M; Moeini H; Soleimani M
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(2):208-218. PubMed ID: 33253606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of absorbed radiation doses to skin and S-values for organs at risk due to nasal administration of PET agents using Monte Carlo simulations.
    O'Doherty J; Mangini CD; Hamby DM; Boozer D; Singh N; Hippeläinen E
    Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):871-880. PubMed ID: 33330987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Monte Carlo dose calculations near 125I sources in the presence of bounded heterogeneities.
    Das RK; Keleti D; Zhu Y; Kirov AS; Meigooni AS; Williamson JF
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):843-53. PubMed ID: 9240654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations.
    Pacilio M; Lanconelli N; Lo MS; Betti M; Montani L; Torres AL; Coca PM
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1543-52. PubMed ID: 19544770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.