592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36897193)
21. Outcomes and survival of a modern dual mobility cup and uncemented collared stem in displaced femoral neck fractures at a minimum 5-year follow-up.
Bordes M; Viste A; Fauvernier M; Mercier M; Chaudier P; Severyns M; Fessy MH
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 108(1):103164. PubMed ID: 34863956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design.
Philippot R; Adam P; Reckhaus M; Delangle F; Verdot F-; Curvale G; Farizon F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 95(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 19656750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative study of total hip arthroplasties with dual mobility cups versus hemiarthroplasties in management of femoral neck fractures: Survival and dislocation rate at 5 years of follow-up?
Bertault-Le Gourrierec J; Cavaignac E; Berard E; Moretti F; Marot V; Chiron P; Reina N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 108(1):103098. PubMed ID: 34624538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of dual-mobility acetabular implants on revision and survivorship of cup and Kerboull-type reinforcement ring constructs in aseptic acetabular loosening.
Bozon O; Dagneaux L; Sanchez T; Gaillard F; Hamoui M; Canovas F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):103071. PubMed ID: 34560312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The benefit of the systematic revision of the acetabular implant in favor of a dual mobility articulation during the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur: a 49 cases prospective comparative study.
Perrin A; Saab M; Putman S; Benad K; Drumez E; Chantelot C
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 28900737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cementless hydroxyapatite-coated stem with dual mobility and posterior approach in over-80 year-old patients with osteoarthritis: Rates of dislocation and periprosthetic fracture at a mean 8 years' follow-up.
Belgaïd V; Viste A; Fessy MH
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):103196. PubMed ID: 34958972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.
Hamadouche M; Ropars M; Rodaix C; Musset T; Gaucher F; Biau D; Courpied JP; Huten D
Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):513-519. PubMed ID: 27889840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What Is the Dislocation and Revision Rate of Dual-mobility Cups Used in Complex Revision THAs?
Unter Ecker N; Kocaoğlu H; Zahar A; Haasper C; Gehrke T; Citak M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Feb; 479(2):280-285. PubMed ID: 32898046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What Is the Long-term Survivorship of Primary and Revision Cemented Distal Femoral Replacements for Limb Salvage of Patients With Sarcoma?
Geiger EJ; Arnold MT; Hart CM; Greig D; Trikha R; Sekimura T; Eckardt JJ; Bernthal NM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Mar; 481(3):460-471. PubMed ID: 35943730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty using the modular dual mobility acetabular system to treat recurrent dislocation.
Park CW; Lim SJ; Kim IS; Jang MC; Moon YW; Park YS
Int Orthop; 2022 Apr; 46(4):789-795. PubMed ID: 35064307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.
Harwin SF; Sodhi N; Ehiorobo J; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():367-370. PubMed ID: 30500976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup.
Schneider L; Philippot R; Boyer B; Farizon F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):807-13. PubMed ID: 22119512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dislocation and survival rate of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with high risk of instability.
Ameztoy Gallego J; Cruz Pardos A; Gomez Luque J; Cuadrado Rubio LE; Fernández Fernández R
Int Orthop; 2023 Jul; 47(7):1757-1764. PubMed ID: 37085676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What is the rate of successful closed reduction of dislocated dual mobility cups following complex revision hip arthroplasty?
Unter Ecker N; Sangaletti R; Ohlmeier M; Akkaya M; Ekhtiari S; Klaber I; Gehrke T; Citak M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Oct; 143(10):6439-6445. PubMed ID: 37000267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proximal Femur Replacements for an Oncologic Indication Offer a Durable Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Option: A 40-year Experience.
Trikha R; Greig DE; Olson TE; Kendal JK; Geiger EJ; Wessel LE; Eckardt JJ; Bernthal NM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Nov; 481(11):2236-2243. PubMed ID: 37458708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
