151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36897371)
41. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Duan L; Zhang YH; Niu K; Wang WY; Qin L; Zhang XL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Anterior Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Safe Route for Apical Repair.
Solomon ER; St Marie P; Jones KA; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(8):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 32487884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [UTEROSACRAL VERSUS SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOLLOWING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
Nasser-Saman D; Yonis G; Haya N; Lavie O; Abramov Y
Harefuah; 2022 Jun; 161(6):342-348. PubMed ID: 35734789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Anatomical and functional outcomes after hysterectomy and bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for stage IV uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective case series.
Kavvadias T; Schoenfisch B; Brucker SY; Reisenauer C
BMC Urol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):126. PubMed ID: 32814553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement.
Lo TS; Horng SG; Huang HJ; Lee SJ; Liang CC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Oct; 84(10):992-5. PubMed ID: 16167917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Native Tissue Prolapse Repairs: Comparative Effectiveness Trials.
Siff LN; Barber MD
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Mar; 43(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 26880509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Novel Incision-free Device for Transvaginal Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.
Nathan JH; Goldberg RP; Chill HH; Scherr D; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):959-965. PubMed ID: 31301468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Permanent or absorbable suture material for sacrospinous ligament fixation: Does it matter?
Padoa A; Ziv Y; Tsviban A; Tomashev R; Smorgick N; Fligelman T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Apr; 283():112-117. PubMed ID: 36827752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Apical sling: an approach to posthysterectomy vault prolapse.
Alas AN; Pereira I; Chandrasekaran N; Devakumar H; Espaillat L; Hurtado E; Davila GW
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1433-6. PubMed ID: 27052327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A new reusable suturing device for vaginal sacrospinous fixation: feasibility and safety study.
Friedman T; Neuman M; Peled Y; Krissi H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():23-6. PubMed ID: 26210292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome?
Lo TS; Uy-Patrimonio MC; Hsieh WC; Yang JC; Huang SY; Chua S
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):811-819. PubMed ID: 28971245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Sacrospinous vaginal fixation--current status.
Petri E; Ashok K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 May; 90(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 21306342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Basic procedures in tension-free vaginal mesh operation for pelvic organ prolapse.
Takeyama M
Int J Urol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):555-6. PubMed ID: 21711397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse.
Chen Y; Hua K
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Under Local Anesthesia in Elderly Patients at High Risk of General Anesthesia.
Senturk MB; Doğan O
J Invest Surg; 2020 Jan; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29733751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Anatomical landmarks regarding sacrospinous colpopexy operations performed for vaginal vault prolapse.
Sagsoz N; Ersoy M; Kamaci M; Tekdemir I
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Feb; 101(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 11803104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review.
Morgan DM; Rogers MA; Huebner M; Wei JT; Delancey JO
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1424-33. PubMed ID: 17540817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
