151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36897371)
61. Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study.
Delacroix C; Allegre L; Chatziioannidou K; Gérard A; Fatton B; de Tayrac R
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Dec; 33(12):3519-3527. PubMed ID: 35226145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Anterior needle-guided mesh in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: apical fixation on sacrospinous ligaments.
Menahem N; Natalia S; Vladimir S; Jacob B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jan; 172():120-3. PubMed ID: 24210791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up.
Lo TS; Al-Kharabsheh AM; Tan YL; Pue LB; Hsieh WC; Uy-Patrimonio MC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 29241922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Vaginal mesh repair SYSTEMS for pelvic organ prolapse: Anatomical study comparing transobturator/trangluteal versus single incision techniques.
Campagna G; Panico G; Morciano A; Gadonneix P; Delmas V; Cervigni M; Ercoli A; Scambia G
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Mar; 37(3):1024-1030. PubMed ID: 28922462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.
Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Manodoro S
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jul; 28(7):1103-1105. PubMed ID: 28070600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Ng SC; Tsui KP; Huang L; Chen GD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():167-171. PubMed ID: 31299523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Does bilateral sacrospinous fixation with synthetic mesh recreate nulliparous pelvic anatomy? An MRI evaluation.
Nicolau-Toulouse V; Tiwari P; Lee T; Cundiff GW; Geoffrion R
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 24978089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The impact of sacrospinous ligament fixation on pre-existing nocturia and co-existing pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms.
Himmler M; Rakhimbayeva A; Sutherland SE; Roovers JP; Yassouridis A; Liedl B
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):919-928. PubMed ID: 32778918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Sacrospinous ligament suspension with transobturator mesh versus sacral colpopexy for genital prolapse.
Juliato CR; Mazzer MF; Diniz JM; Farias CH; de Castro EB
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2016 Sep; 71(9):487-93. PubMed ID: 27652828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.
Heinonen PK; Nieminen K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suture-capturing device versus traditional technique: feasibility and outcome.
Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Alessandri F; Remorgida V; Venturini PL; Ferrero S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 22941353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Effect and safety of Lasso suture hook in transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation].
Guo LS; Zheng LJ; Dai SR; Zhang SJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Sep; 103(36):2889-2892. PubMed ID: 37726996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Anatomical insights into sacrocolpopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse.
Ercoli A; Campagna G; Delmas V; Ferrari S; Morciano A; Scambia G; Cervigni M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Sep; 35(7):813-8. PubMed ID: 26147420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Vascular complication after sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation.
Jain A; Sheorain VS; Ahlawat K; Ahlawat R
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Mar; 28(3):489-491. PubMed ID: 27539567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1421-1423. PubMed ID: 28188468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?
Sauerwald A; Bruns I; Peveling B; Brunke H; Wolff F
Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Mar; 22(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 21153470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Study on morphological characteristics of uterosacral and cardinal ligament in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse based on MRI].
Ma X; Shang S; Xie B; Sun X; Yang X; Wu J; Hong N; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 50(9):668-72. PubMed ID: 26675393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
Chill HH; Cohen-Milun G; Cohen A; Moss NP; Winer JD; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
