173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36897699)
1. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting survival of advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of machine learning models and Cox regression models.
Zhang YF; Shen YJ; Huang Q; Wu CP; Zhou L; Ren HL
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18498. PubMed ID: 37898687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms to Cox Regression in Predicting the Survival of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancers: Analyses Based on SEER Database.
Du M; Haag DG; Lynch JW; Mittinty MN
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33003533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.
Xia K; Chen D; Jin S; Yi X; Luo L
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14827. PubMed ID: 37684259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Application value of machine learning algorithms for predicting recurrence after resection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma].
Ji GW; Wang K; Xia YX; Li XC; Wang XH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 59(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 34192861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of nomogram with random survival forest for prediction of survival in patients with spindle cell carcinoma.
Zhang X; Liang J; Du Z; Xie Q; Li T; Tang F
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022 Dec; 18(7):2006-2012. PubMed ID: 36647963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Wang D; Pan B; Huang JC; Chen Q; Cui SP; Lang R; Lyu SC
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1106029. PubMed ID: 37007095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of survival prediction model for gastric adenocarcinoma patients using deep learning: A SEER-based study.
Zeng J; Li K; Cao F; Zheng Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1131859. PubMed ID: 36959782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine learning-based overall and cancer-specific survival prediction of M0 penile squamous cell carcinoma：A population-based retrospective study.
Chen D; Liang S; Chen J; Li K; Mi H
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23442. PubMed ID: 38163093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with chondrosarcoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.
Yan L; Gao N; Ai F; Zhao Y; Kang Y; Chen J; Weng Y
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():967758. PubMed ID: 36072795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of survival support vector machine combined with random survival forest to predict the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Xiao Z; Song Q; Wei Y; Fu Y; Huang D; Huang C
Transl Cancer Res; 2023 Dec; 12(12):3581-3590. PubMed ID: 38192980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel head and neck cancer survival analysis approach: random survival forests versus Cox proportional hazards regression.
Datema FR; Moya A; Krause P; Bäck T; Willmes L; Langeveld T; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Blom HM
Head Neck; 2012 Jan; 34(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21322080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Explainable machine learning predicts survival of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A study based on the SEER database and external validation in China.
Wang M; Li Z; Zeng S; Wang Z; Ying Y; He W; Zhang Z; Wang H; Xu C
Cancer Med; 2024 Jun; 13(11):e7324. PubMed ID: 38847519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and visualization of a risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study based on health check-up data in China.
Liu W; Tang X; Cui T; Zhao H; Song G
Front Nutr; 2023; 10():1286654. PubMed ID: 38075230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality for acute coronary syndrome
Hadanny A; Shouval R; Wu J; Gale CP; Unger R; Zahger D; Gottlieb S; Matetzky S; Goldenberg I; Beigel R; Iakobishvili Z
J Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 79(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 34857429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognosis prediction of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcomas treated with surgical resection with radiomic analysis based on random survival forest.
Yang Y; Ma X; Wang Y; Ding X
Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):355-365. PubMed ID: 34003477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?
Bongers MER; Karhade AV; Setola E; Gambarotti M; Groot OQ; Erdoğan KE; Picci P; Donati DM; Schwab JH; Palmerini E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2300-2308. PubMed ID: 32433107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
