These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36900431)

  • 1. Impacts of Utensil Conditions on Consumer Perception and Acceptance of Food Samples Evaluated under In-Home Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Singh A; Seo HS
    Foods; 2023 Feb; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36900431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the validity of longitudinal comparisons of central location consumer testing results prior to COVID-19 versus home use testing data during the pandemic.
    Shi M; Stelick A; Licker S; Dando R
    J Food Sci; 2021 Oct; 86(10):4668-4677. PubMed ID: 34533213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Test Location and Sample Number on the Liking Ratings of Almond Beverage and Vegan Ramen Products.
    Yoon JY; Kwak HS; Kim MR; Chung SJ
    Foods; 2023 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36766160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of sensory attribute profiles and liking between regular and sodium-reduced food products.
    Nguyen H; Wismer WV
    Food Res Int; 2019 Sep; 123():631-641. PubMed ID: 31285012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Using a Perforated Spoon on Salt Reduction When Consuming Ramen Noodles: A Randomized Crossover Study of Japanese Male University Students.
    Sugimoto M; Tajiri E; Nakashima N; Sakamoto T
    Nutrients; 2023 Jun; 15(13):. PubMed ID: 37447190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frying dough with yellow mealworm oil: Aroma profile and consumer perception at a central location test and at home.
    Tzompa-Sosa DA; Provijn P; Gellynck X; Schouteten JJ
    J Food Sci; 2023 Mar; 88(S1):130-146. PubMed ID: 36478571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a central location test versus a home usage test for consumer perception of ready-to-mix protein beverages.
    Zhang MT; Jo Y; Lopetcharat K; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3107-3124. PubMed ID: 32089312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adapted Feeding Utensils for People With Parkinson's-Related or Essential Tremor.
    Sabari J; Stefanov DG; Chan J; Goed L; Starr J
    Am J Occup Ther; 2019; 73(2):7302205120p1-7302205120p9. PubMed ID: 30915973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of companion foods on sensory attribute perception and liking of regular and sodium-reduced foods.
    Nguyen H; Wismer WV
    J Food Sci; 2020 Apr; 85(4):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 32243589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of health/hedonic claims on consumer hedonic and sensory perception of sugar reduction: Case study with orange/passionfruit nectars.
    Oliveira D; Ares G; Deliza R
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jun; 108():111-118. PubMed ID: 29735039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer testing away from a sensory facility: Application of home-use test and no-contact home-use test.
    Park S; Heo J; Oh J; Chung SJ; Sub Kwak H
    Food Qual Prefer; 2023 Jul; 109():104905. PubMed ID: 37274459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What the forks? A longitudinal quality improvement study tracking cutlery numbers in a public teaching and research hospital staff tearoom.
    Mattiussi M; Livermore A; Levido A; Starr T; Lassig-Smith M; Stuart J; Fourie C; Dulhunty J
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213(11):521-523. PubMed ID: 33314112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations in consumer acceptance, sensory engagement and method practicality across three remote consumer-testing modalities.
    Albiol Tapia M; Lee SY
    Food Qual Prefer; 2022 Sep; 100():104616. PubMed ID: 36168447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer acceptability and monetary value perception of iced coffee beverages vary with drinking conditions using different types of straws or lids.
    Beekman TL; Huck L; Claure B; Seo HS
    Food Res Int; 2021 Feb; 140():109849. PubMed ID: 33648167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online consumer testing beyond central location tests: A case study for brewed coffee.
    Park S; Lee CL; Oh J; Lim M; Chung SJ; Kwak HS
    Food Res Int; 2024 Jul; 187():114349. PubMed ID: 38763638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the research setting on the emotional and sensory profiling under blind, expected, and informed conditions: A study on premium and private label yogurt products.
    Schouteten JJ; De Steur H; Sas B; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Gellynck X
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):169-186. PubMed ID: 27837971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic Context Sensory Testing-A Proof of Concept Study Bringing Virtual Reality to the Sensory Booth.
    Stelick A; Penano AG; Riak AC; Dando R
    J Food Sci; 2018 Aug; 83(8):2047-2051. PubMed ID: 30044500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality Environments on Sensory Perception of Beef Steaks and Chocolate.
    Crofton E; Murray N; Botinestean C
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34063901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer acceptance of watermelon flesh-rind blends and the effect of rind on refreshing perception.
    Ramirez JL; Juma S; Du X
    J Food Sci; 2021 Apr; 86(4):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 33650130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context effect of environmental setting and product information in acceptability testing of tea and cola: A study comparing sensory engagement in a traditional sensory booth and a study commons.
    Albiol Tapia M; Baik HY; Simons CT; Lee SY
    J Food Sci; 2021 Jun; 86(6):2640-2654. PubMed ID: 34056728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.