These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3690064)

  • 1. The assessment of lipreading ability: some practical considerations in the use of the tracking procedure.
    Fenn G; Smith BZ
    Br J Audiol; 1987 Nov; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 3690064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual speech processing: word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairment.
    Lyxell B; Rönnberg J
    Scand J Psychol; 1991; 32(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 2047800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of connected speech without lipreading, using a multi-channel hearing prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Brown AM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1986; 102(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 3755563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of text complexity on connected discourse tracking rate.
    Hochberg I; Rosen S; Ball V
    Ear Hear; 1989 Jun; 10(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 2744257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.
    Gray RF; Quinn SJ; Court I; Vanat Z; Baguley DM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():275-7. PubMed ID: 7668667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual speech influences speech perception immediately but not automatically.
    Mitterer H; Reinisch E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 27905070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critique of continuous discourse tracking as a test procedure.
    Tye-Murray N; Tyler RS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Aug; 53(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 3294503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: discrimination ability of untrained observers.
    Reed CM; Rubin SI; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):625-36. PubMed ID: 745365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new protocol for assessing viseme perception in sentence context: the lipreading discrimination test.
    Bement L; Wallber J; DeFilippo C; Bochner J; Garrison W
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3342942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audio-visual discrimination of speech.
    McCormick B
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1979 Oct; 4(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 487634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-tracking performance in single-channel cochlear implant subjects.
    Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Miyamoto RT; Kienle ML; Myres WA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):565-78. PubMed ID: 3841379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tactile perception of various suprasegmental characteristics of speech as compared to lipreading].
    Prosser S; Arslan E; Trevisi P; Zecchini B
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1987; 7(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 3455092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discriminating languages by speech-reading.
    Soto-Faraco S; Navarra J; Weikum WM; Vouloumanos A; Sebastián-Gallés N; Werker JF
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 17557592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects.
    Grant KW; Ardell LH; Kuhl PK; Sparks DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):671-7. PubMed ID: 3973238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Word list for evaluating oral language perception in children with total and partial hearing impairment].
    Villalba Pérez A; Ferrández Mora JA; Ros Blasco V
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10217691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise.
    Middelweerd MJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):2145-7. PubMed ID: 3429736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.