These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36901348)

  • 1. The Effects on Energy Markets of Achieving a 1.5 °C Scenario.
    Lindholt L; Wei T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions.
    Jewell J; McCollum D; Emmerling J; Bertram C; Gernaat DEHJ; Krey V; Paroussos L; Berger L; Fragkiadakis K; Keppo I; Saadi N; Tavoni M; van Vuuren D; Vinichenko V; Riahi K
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7691):229-233. PubMed ID: 29420477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target.
    Tong D; Zhang Q; Zheng Y; Caldeira K; Shearer C; Hong C; Qin Y; Davis SJ
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7769):373-377. PubMed ID: 31261374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C.
    McGlade C; Ekins P
    Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7533):187-90. PubMed ID: 25567285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rebound effect of energy efficiency in China's construction industry: a general equilibrium analysis.
    Du Q; Li Z; Li Y; Bai L; Li J; Han X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(12):12217-12226. PubMed ID: 30835070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement.
    Tambo E; Duo-Quan W; Zhou XN
    Environ Int; 2016 Oct; 95():152-6. PubMed ID: 27107974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world.
    Welsby D; Price J; Pye S; Ekins P
    Nature; 2021 Sep; 597(7875):230-234. PubMed ID: 34497394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition.
    Slameršak A; Kallis G; O'Neill DW
    Nat Commun; 2022 Nov; 13(1):6932. PubMed ID: 36376312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interfuel substitution, hydroelectricity consumption and CO
    Bello MO; Solarin SA; Yen YY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(14):17162-17174. PubMed ID: 32146676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trading Off Global Fuel Supply, CO2 Emissions and Sustainable Development.
    Wagner L; Ross I; Foster J; Hankamer B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149406. PubMed ID: 26959977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transitioning to a high renewable net-zero power generation system in Malaysia.
    Chan HY; Sopian K
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2022 Apr; 380(2221):20210132. PubMed ID: 35220765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drivers toward a Low-Carbon Electricity System in China's Provinces.
    Peng X; Tao X; Feng K; Hubacek K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(9):5774-5782. PubMed ID: 32250594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State of energy consumption and CO2 emission in Bangladesh.
    Azad AK; Nashreen SW; Sultana J
    Ambio; 2006 Mar; 35(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 16722254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of CO
    Abdallah L; El-Shennawy T
    EuroMediterr J Environ Integr; 2020; 5(3):49. PubMed ID: 32984503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Climate Mitigation Challenge-Where Do We Stand?
    Princiotta FT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Oct; 71(10):1234-1250. PubMed ID: 34233128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal.
    Brecha RJ; Ganti G; Lamboll RD; Nicholls Z; Hare B; Lewis J; Meinshausen M; Schaeffer M; Smith CJ; Gidden MJ
    Nat Commun; 2022 Aug; 13(1):4304. PubMed ID: 35973995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How much do direct livestock emissions actually contribute to global warming?
    Reisinger A; Clark H
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Apr; 24(4):1749-1761. PubMed ID: 29105912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a wavelet coherence approach.
    Bilgili F; Öztürk İ; Koçak E; Bulut Ü; Pamuk Y; Muğaloğlu E; Bağlıtaş HH
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Oct; 23(19):19043-61. PubMed ID: 27335019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The emission abatement policy paradox in Australia: evidence from energy-emission nexus.
    Ahmed K; Ozturk I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Sep; 23(17):17850-6. PubMed ID: 27421853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Energy carbon emission structure and reduction potential focused on the supply-side and demand-side.
    Kang J; Yang Y
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239634. PubMed ID: 33021990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.