133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36903093)
1. Optically Stimulated Luminescent Response of the LiMgPO
Sądel M; Grzanka L; Swakoń J; Baran J; Gajewski J; Bilski P
Materials (Basel); 2023 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 36903093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D Dosimetry Based on LiMgPO
Sądel M; Gajewski J; Sowa U; Swakoń J; Kajdrowicz T; Bilski P; Kłosowski M; Pędracka A; Horwacik T
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of average LET of therapeutic proton beams using Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) detectors.
Sawakuchi GO; Sahoo N; Gasparian PB; Rodriguez MG; Archambault L; Titt U; Yukihara EG
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):4963-76. PubMed ID: 20693613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters in the spread-out Bragg peak region of clinical proton beams.
Kerns JR; Kry SF; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1854-63. PubMed ID: 22482607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-resolved optically stimulated luminescence of Al2O3:C for ion beam therapy dosimetry.
Yukihara EG; Doull BA; Ahmed M; Brons S; Tessonnier T; Jäkel O; Greilich S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(17):6613-38. PubMed ID: 26270884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical and thermal pre-readout treatments to reduce the influence of fading on LiMgPO
Malthez ALMC; Marczewska B; Kulig D; Bilski P; Kłosowski M
Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Jun; 136():118-120. PubMed ID: 29494944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration of the Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signal for linear energy transfer (LET) measurements in therapeutic proton beams.
Granville DA; Sahoo N; Sawakuchi GO
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4295-310. PubMed ID: 25029434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative TL and OSL efficiency to protons of various dosimetric materials.
Sądel M; Bilski P; Swakoń J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):112-5. PubMed ID: 24036656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous measurements of absorbed dose and linear energy transfer in therapeutic proton beams.
Granville DA; Sahoo N; Sawakuchi GO
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(4):1765-79. PubMed ID: 26859539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative energy response of indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters Al
Kumar P; Dhabekar B; Sharma SD; Mishra DR; Rawat NS; Kadam S; Chaudhari S; Chandola RM; Agrawal S
Luminescence; 2020 Dec; 35(8):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 32515166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-resolution three-dimensional dosimetry in clinically relevant volumes utilizing optically stimulated luminescence.
Jensen ML; Julsgaard B; Turtos RM; Skyt PS; Jensen MB; Muren LP; Balling P
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2200-2209. PubMed ID: 37929802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose- rather than fluence-averaged LET should be used as a single-parameter descriptor of proton beam quality for radiochromic film dosimetry.
Resch AF; Heyes PD; Fuchs H; Bassler N; Georg D; Palmans H
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2289-2299. PubMed ID: 32166764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LET response variability of Gafchromic
Smith BR; Pankuch M; Hammer CG; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2716-2728. PubMed ID: 30740699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of LiMgPO4 crystal for proton beam quality control in radiotherapy.
Wróbel D; Kowalski T; Kusyk S; Marczewska B; Nowak T; Olko P; Swakoń J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Oct; 199(15-16):1937-1940. PubMed ID: 37819291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-storage phosphor proton therapy dosimetry: Simultaneous quantification of dose and linear energy transfer.
Setianegara J; Mazur TR; Yang D; Li HH
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1941-1955. PubMed ID: 33525050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The energy dependence and dose response of a commercial optically stimulated luminescent detector for kilovoltage photon, megavoltage photon, and electron, proton, and carbon beams.
Reft CS
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1690-9. PubMed ID: 19544786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beta response of LiMgPO4:Tb,B based OSL discs for personnel monitoring applications.
Kumar M; Dhabekar B; Menon SN; Bakshi AK; Udhayakumar J; Chougaonkar MP; Mayya YS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 23440498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective generation of the spread-out-Bragg peak from the laser accelerated proton beams using a carbon-proton mixed target.
Yoo SH; Cho I; Cho S; Song Y; Jung WG; Kim DH; Shin D; Lee SB; Pae KH; Park SY
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 37(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 25154880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
