205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3690439)
1. Sensory discrimination and its relationship to the cerebral processing of infrequent stimuli.
Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Mantle MM
Can J Neurol Sci; 1987 Nov; 14(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 3690439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans.
Ortiz TA; Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ
J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1499-512. PubMed ID: 8509828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Event-related brain potentials and attention during simultaneous performance of two tasks.
Sullivan C
Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct; 83(2):651-7. PubMed ID: 8902045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Habitual napping moderates motor performance improvements following a short daytime nap.
Milner CE; Fogel SM; Cote KA
Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 16540232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetoencephalography: locating the source of P300 via magnetic field recording.
Gordon E; Sloggett G; Harvey I; Kraiuhin C; Rennie C; Yiannikas C; Meares R
Clin Exp Neurol; 1987; 23():101-10. PubMed ID: 3665159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motor and nonmotor event-related potentials during a complex processing task.
Hillman CH; Apparies RJ; Hatfield BD
Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 11117453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory event-related potentials in mentally retarded subjects during active and passive oddball experiments.
Zurrón M; Díaz F
Biol Psychiatry; 1997 Jan; 41(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 9018391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal and external control: a two-factor model of amplitude change of event-related potentials.
Kok A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Aug; 74(2-3):203-36. PubMed ID: 2251929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Event related brain potentials and signal detection: decision confidence and signal probability].
Münte TF; Münte E; Heinze HJ; Scholz M
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1989 Mar; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 2495920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subclasses of event-related potentials: response-locked and stimulus-locked components.
Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Mantle MM
Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 3789674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing.
Anourova I; Nikouline VV; Ilmoniemi RJ; Hotta J; Aronen HJ; Carlson S
Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1268-77. PubMed ID: 11707083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reliability of parameters of cognitive evoked P3 potentials].
Minow F; von Suchodoletz W; Uwer R
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 1996 Dec; 24(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 9459687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of reaction time in continuous performance tasks as an index of attention by electrophysiological measures.
Reinvang I
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):885-97. PubMed ID: 10484699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. OSP parameters and the cognitive component of reaction time to a missing stimulus: linking brain and behavior.
Hernández OH; Vogel-Sprott M
Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19501943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.
Horváth J; Roeber U; Bendixen A; Schröger E
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1229():193-203. PubMed ID: 18634759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gamma-band activity dissociates between matching and nonmatching stimulus pairs in an auditory delayed matching-to-sample task.
Leiberg S; Kaiser J; Lutzenberger W
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1357-64. PubMed ID: 16469508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. P300 response under active and passive attentional states and uni- and bimodality stimulus presentation conditions.
Rappaport M; Clifford JO; Winterfield KM
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1990; 2(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 2136392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence.
Holm A; Ranta-aho PO; Sallinen M; Karjalainen PA; Müller K
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 16364479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
