142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36905734)
1. Comparison of MBR and MBBR followed by UV or electrochemical disinfection for decentralized greywater treatment.
Ongena S; de Walle AV; Mosquera-Romero S; Driesen N; Gutierrez L; Rabaey K
Water Res; 2023 May; 235():119818. PubMed ID: 36905734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Organic matter degradation in a greywater recycling system using a multistage moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR).
Saidi A; Masmoudi K; Nolde E; El Amrani B; Amraoui F
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3328-3339. PubMed ID: 29236012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New functional biocarriers for enhancing the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
Deng L; Guo W; Ngo HH; Zhang X; Wang XC; Zhang Q; Chen R
Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 208():87-93. PubMed ID: 26926200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of micropollutant removal and fouling reduction in a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
Luo Y; Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Wang J; Guo W
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():355-9. PubMed ID: 26031758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of UV disinfection and the microbial quality of greywater effluent along a reuse system for toilet flushing.
Friedler E; Gilboa Y
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(9):2109-17. PubMed ID: 20172592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of carrier addition on water quality and pharmaceutical removal capacity of a membrane bioreactor - Advanced oxidation process combined treatment.
Monteoliva-García A; Martín-Pascual J; Muñío MM; Poyatos JM
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 708():135104. PubMed ID: 31787301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Life cycle assessment of decentralized greywater treatment systems with reuse at different scales in cold regions.
Kobayashi Y; Ashbolt NJ; Davies EGR; Liu Y
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105215. PubMed ID: 31715488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of the microbial quality of greywater treated by three on-site treatment systems.
Friedler E; Kovalio R; Ben-Zvi A
Environ Technol; 2006 Jun; 27(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 16865921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimized MBR for greywater reuse systems in hotel facilities.
Atanasova N; Dalmau M; Comas J; Poch M; Rodriguez-Roda I; Buttiglieri G
J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 193():503-511. PubMed ID: 28249760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effectiveness of membrane bioreactors, conventional secondary treatment, and chlorine and UV disinfection to remove microorganisms from municipal wastewaters.
Francy DS; Stelzer EA; Bushon RN; Brady AM; Williston AG; Riddell KR; Borchardt MA; Spencer SK; Gellner TM
Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(13):4164-78. PubMed ID: 22682268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of salinity variation on the autotrophic kinetics of the start-up of a membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor at low hydraulic retention time.
Leyva-Díaz JC; Rodríguez-Sánchez A; González-López J; Poyatos JM
Water Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 77(3-4):714-720. PubMed ID: 29431716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of biomass from integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS), moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating recalcitrant organics: Importance of attached biomass.
Huang C; Shi Y; Xue J; Zhang Y; Gamal El-Din M; Liu Y
J Hazard Mater; 2017 Mar; 326():120-129. PubMed ID: 28012315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recycled corrugated wire hose cover as biological carriers for greywater treatment in a sequential batch biofilm reactor.
Tombola R; Buttiglieri G; Auset M; Gonzalez-Olmos R
J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 240():475-484. PubMed ID: 30965175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human health impact of non-potable reuse of distributed wastewater and greywater treated by membrane bioreactors.
Schoen ME; Jahne MA; Garland J
Microb Risk Anal; 2018 Aug; 9():72-81. PubMed ID: 35280215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Steady-state modeling of the biodegradation performance of a multistage moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) used for on-site greywater treatment.
Masmoudi Jabri K; Fiedler T; Saidi A; Nolde E; Ogurek M; Geissen SU; Bousselmi L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jul; 26(19):19047-19062. PubMed ID: 30612353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Start-up of membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor: kinetic study.
Leyva-Díaz JC; Poyatos JM
Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(11):1948-53. PubMed ID: 26606088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anaerobic/aerobic treatment of greywater via UASB and MBR for unrestricted reuse.
Abdel-Shafy HI; Al-Sulaiman AM; Mansour MS
Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(4):630-7. PubMed ID: 25746657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost.
Udomkittayachai N; Xue W; Xiao K; Visvanathan C; Tabucanon AS
Water Res; 2021 Jan; 188():116547. PubMed ID: 33126002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor.
Rahimi Y; Torabian A; Mehrdadi N; Habibi-Rezaie M; Pezeshk H; Nabi-Bidhendi GR
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):1097-102. PubMed ID: 21168965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of a low cost ceramic filter to a membrane bioreactor for greywater treatment.
Hasan MM; Shafiquzzaman M; Nakajima J; Ahmed AK; Azam MS
Water Environ Res; 2015 Mar; 87(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 25842534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
