These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36906490)

  • 1. Evaluation of facial profile characteristics of aesthetically pleasing Iranian faces.
    Esmaeili S; Mohammadi NM; Khosravani S; Eslamian L; Motamedian SR
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Apr; 12(2):76-89. PubMed ID: 36906490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables.
    Rakhshan V; Ghorbanyjavadpour F
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 30941649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian Class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces.
    Amini F; Razavian ZS; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 26853371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.
    Hamdan AM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 19852644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of facial esthetics in young North Indian population.
    Thakral R; Kapoor S; Shukla P; Sharma VK; Bhagchandani J; Agarwal S; Jaiswal RK
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():21. PubMed ID: 35754409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study on craniofacial morphology of Japanese subjects with normal occlusion and esthetic profile.
    Nakahara C; Nakahara R
    Odontology; 2007 Jul; 95(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 17660981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a north Indian ethnic population.
    Sachan A; Srivastav A; Chaturvedi TP
    J Orthod Sci; 2012 Oct; 1(4):92-7. PubMed ID: 24987634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft-tissue profile growth in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: A cephalometric comparison with normal controls at ages 7, 11, and 18 years.
    Moreira I; Suri S; Ross B; Tompson B; Fisher D; Lou W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):341-58. PubMed ID: 24582026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.