156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36908497)
1. Commissioning and Dosimetric Results of an Indigenously Developed Intra-Vaginal Template for Interstitial Plus Intracavitary High dose Rate Image-Guided Brachytherapy of Advanced Cervix Cancer.
Kaliyaperumal V; Banerjee S; Kataria T; Abraham SK; Kamaraj D; Tamilselvan S; Gupta D; Bisht SS; Narang K; Shishak S
J Med Phys; 2022; 47(4):322-330. PubMed ID: 36908497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric analysis of 3D image-guided HDR brachytherapy planning for the treatment of cervical cancer: is point A-based dose prescription still valid in image-guided brachytherapy?
Kim H; Beriwal S; Houser C; Huq MS
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 20488690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric comparison of
Shukla AK; Jangid PK; Rajpurohit VS; Verma A; Dangayach SK; Gagrani V; Rathore NK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(6):1212-1215. PubMed ID: 31898649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image guided radiation therapy boost in combination with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer.
Wang X; Li J; Wang P; Yuan K; Yin G; Wan B
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2016 Apr; 8(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 27257416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-fractional dosimetric analysis of image-guided intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Yan J; Zhu J; Chen K; Yu L; Zhang F
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):144. PubMed ID: 34348758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric study for cervix carcinoma treatment using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compensation based on 3D intracavitary brachytherapy technique.
Yin G; Wang P; Lang J; Tian Y; Luo Y; Fan Z; Tam KY
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2016 Jun; 8(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 27504132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose-volume histogram parameters and local tumor control in magnetic resonance image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Dimopoulos JC; Lang S; Kirisits C; Fidarova EF; Berger D; Georg P; Dörr W; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Sep; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19289267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trans-rectal ultrasound-guided hybrid intra-cavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix: A feasibility study from a tertiary cancer center in India.
Bajwa HK; Singareddy R; Talluri AK; Kauser H; Boja DR; Srikanth G; Raju AK; Sresty NM; Mytri V
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2023 Jun; 15(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 37425200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and comparison of dosimetric parameters between intracavitary (Fletcher) and combined intracavitary/interstitial (Utrecht) brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Sarwar KA; Hussain S; Syed AS; Khan K; Maqsood T; Azeem T
Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 37813708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy including oblique needles in locally advanced cervix cancer.
Serban M; Fokdal L; Nielsen SK; Hokland SB; Hansen AT; Spejlborg H; Rylander S; Petric P; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):796-806. PubMed ID: 33994344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study of toxicity outcomes using GEC-ESTRO contouring guidelines on CT based instead of MRI-based planning in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
Koh V; Choo BA; Lee KM; Tan TH; Low JH; Ng SY; Ilancheran A; Shen L; Tang J
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 27816539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric feasibility of computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a Japanese prospective multi-institutional study.
Otani Y; Ohno T; Ando K; Murata K; Kato S; Noda SE; Murofushi K; Ushijima H; Yoshida D; Okonogi N; Isohashi F; Wakatsuki M; Nakano T
J Radiat Res; 2021 May; 62(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 33532828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of dose differences between intracavitary applicators for cervical brachytherapy using knowledge-based models.
Kallis K; Mayadev J; Covele B; Brown D; Scanderbeg D; Simon A; Frisbie-Firsching H; Yashar CM; Einck JP; Mell LK; Moore KL; Meyers SM
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(6):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 34607771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single Application Multifractionated Image Guided Adaptive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: Dosimetric and Clinical Outcomes.
Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Bushra S; Ghadi Y; Aravindakshan D; Paul J; Hande V; Pilar A; Chopra S; Ghosh J; Shylasree TS; Popat P; Sable N; Maheswari A; Gupta S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Nov; 111(3):826-834. PubMed ID: 34146636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-Fractional Variations in Volume and Radiation Dose to the Organs at Risk, High-Risk Clinical Target Volume and Implication of Image-Guided Adaptive Planning During Intracavitary Brachytherapy of Carcinoma Cervix.
Patil G; Br KK; Narayanan G
Cureus; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e21503. PubMed ID: 35223279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical needle selection for Vienna-style applicators: improving therapeutic ratio in hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy.
Martin DA; Taunk NK; Anamalayil S; Mangal V; Marcel J; Hubley E
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2021 Oct; 13(5):533-540. PubMed ID: 34759978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Boost modalities in cervical cancer: dosimetric comparison between intracavitary BT vs. intracavitary + interstitial BT vs. SBRT.
Benkhaled S; Diakité K; Jullian N; Poeta S; Vandekerkhove C; Van Houtte P; Van Gestel D; De Caluwé A
Radiat Oncol; 2023 Jun; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 37381016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and feasibility of 3D printed redesigned Venezia™ applicator for treating advanced cervix and recurrent endometrial cancer.
Lee VWY; Yip WWL; Tang SYK; Leung MPH; Kwan KKK; Liu ACH; Chan VNY; Wu JWS; Cheng JNS; Chiang CL; Ho-Fun Lee V
Phys Med; 2023 Oct; 114():103150. PubMed ID: 37757501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
