These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36908832)

  • 1. PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta-analysis in evidence-based social science in China: A systematic review.
    Guo L; Zhou W; Xing X; Wei Z; Yang M; Ma M; Yang K; White H
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2022 Dec; 18(4):e1278. PubMed ID: 36908832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 4 : The quality of social science systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from 2000-2019.
    Bai ZG; Bing Q; Gong RR; Bai RH; Zhou Y; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():132-140. PubMed ID: 34662710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review.
    Wang X; Welch V; Li M; Yao L; Littell J; Li H; Yang N; Wang J; Shamseer L; Chen Y; Yang K; Grimshaw JM
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1134. PubMed ID: 37133262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Panic N; Leoncini E; de Belvis G; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83138. PubMed ID: 24386151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
    Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.
    Woo BFY; Tam WWS; Williams MY; Ow Yong JQY; Cheong ZY; Ong YC; Poon SN; Goh YS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2023 Jul; 55(4):874-885. PubMed ID: 36494752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.
    Cullis PS; Gudlaugsdottir K; Andrews J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175213. PubMed ID: 28384296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
    Yang Q; Xian H; Cheng X; Wu X; Meng J; Chen W; Zeng Z
    Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 39107813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.
    Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 37420161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.
    Tian J; Zhang J; Ge L; Yang K; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():50-58. PubMed ID: 28063911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
    Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.