These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36909217)

  • 1. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized controlled trials published in Indian journals pertaining to pharmacology.
    Patil SR; Bhide SS
    Perspect Clin Res; 2023; 14(1):16-19. PubMed ID: 36909217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reporting quality and risk of bias of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for migraine: Methodological study based on STRICTA and RoB 2.0.
    Lu T; Lu C; Li H; Xing X; Deng X; Li X; Wang Y; Niu J; Liu Y; Yang K
    Complement Ther Med; 2020 Aug; 52():102433. PubMed ID: 32951707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study.
    Innocenti T; Giagio S; Salvioli S; Feller D; Minnucci S; Brindisino F; IJzelenberg W; Ostelo R; Chiarotto A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Sep; 103(9):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 35192799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of reporting and risk of bias: a review of randomised trials in occupational health.
    Tikka C; Verbeek J; Ijaz S; Hoving JL; Boschman J; Hulshof C; de Boer AG
    Occup Environ Med; 2021 Sep; 78(9):691-696. PubMed ID: 34162718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals.
    Goenka L; Rajendran S; Arumugam K; Rani J; George M
    Perspect Clin Res; 2019; 10(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 31008074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of bias of randomized trials over time.
    Reveiz L; Chapman E; Asial S; Munoz S; Bonfill X; Alonso-Coello P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1036-45. PubMed ID: 26227423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
    Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
    J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.
    Minozzi S; Cinquini M; Gianola S; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Banzi R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():37-44. PubMed ID: 32562833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of risk of bias in quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials reported in the
    Kim JH; Kim TK; In J; Lee DK; Lee S; Kang H
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2017 Oct; 70(5):511-519. PubMed ID: 29046770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Research: Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2017.
    Baasan O; Freihat O; Nagy DU; Lohner S
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():830070. PubMed ID: 35369336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of orthopaedic manual therapy randomized clinical trials quality.
    Riley SP; Swanson B; Brismée JM; Sawyer SF
    J Man Manip Ther; 2016 Dec; 24(5):241-252. PubMed ID: 27956817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. COMPLIANCE OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS ON DENTAL CARIES PREVENTION METHODS WITH THE CONSORT STATEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
    Ortiz MIG; Ribeiro MES; Lima DANL; Silva CM; Loretto SC; da Silva E Souza Júnior MH
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 21(2):101542. PubMed ID: 34391554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology: hardly any improvement since 1950.
    Peters JPM; Stegeman I; Grolman W; Hooft L
    BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2017; 17():3. PubMed ID: 28428729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts-A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis.
    Kumar S; Mohammad H; Vora H; Kar K
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 18(2):130-141.e22. PubMed ID: 29747793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
    Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews.
    Kabir A; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Karimi Behnagh A; Eidkhani V; Baradaran HR; Kabiri P; Haghdoost A; Mesgarpour B
    Arch Iran Med; 2022 Jun; 25(6):375-382. PubMed ID: 35943017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials of Moxibustion Using STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Moxibustion (STRICTOM) and Risk of Bias (ROB).
    Kim SY; Lee EJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Jung IC; Kim YI
    J Acupunct Meridian Stud; 2017 Aug; 10(4):261-275. PubMed ID: 28889843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review.
    Koletsi D; Spineli LM; Lempesi E; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 26174770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.