These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36909677)

  • 1. NOSER: An Algorithm for Solving the Inverse Conductivity Problem.
    Cheney M; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Simske S; Goble J
    Int J Imaging Syst Technol; 1990; 2(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 36909677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fisher information matrix interpretation of the NOSER algorithm in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hashemzadeh P; Kantartzis P; Zifan A; Liatsis P; Nordebo S; Bayford R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5000-5. PubMed ID: 21096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A real-time electrical impedance tomograph.
    Edic PM; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Isaacson D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Sep; 42(9):849-59. PubMed ID: 7558059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data errors and reconstruction algorithms in electrical impedance tomography.
    Breckon WR; Pidcock MK
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988; 9 Suppl A():105-9. PubMed ID: 3240637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit Solutions of the Electrical Impedance Tomography Inverse Problem in the Continuous Domain with Deep Neural Networks.
    Strauss T; Khan T
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 36981381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved resolution of D-bar images of ventilation using a Schur complement property and an anatomical atlas.
    Santos TBR; Nakanishi RM; de Camargo EDLB; Amato MBP; Kaipio JP; Lima RG; Mueller JL
    Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4653-4670. PubMed ID: 35411573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regularization Solver Guided FISTA for Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Wang Q; Chen X; Wang D; Wang Z; Zhang X; Xie N; Liu L
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Electrical Impedance Tomography and Ultrasonography for Determination of Solid and Cystic Lesion Resembling Breast Tumor Embedded in Chicken Phantom.
    Choridah L; Kurniadi D; Ain K; Ulum MF; Mukhaiyar U; Garnadi AD; Setyawan NH
    J Electr Bioimpedance; 2021 Jan; 12(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 34966468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
    Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive techniques in electrical impedance tomography reconstruction.
    Li T; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1111-24. PubMed ID: 24845260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary.
    Jain H; Isaacson D; Edic PM; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Nov; 44(11):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9353984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A multifrequency time-difference electrical impedance tomography algorithm using spectral constraints].
    Cao L; Yang B; Li H; Liu X; Liu B; Xu C; Liu R; Fu F
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 37(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 32096380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constrained models for optical absorption tomography.
    Polydorides N; Tsekenis A; Fisher E; Chighine A; McCann H; Dimiccoli L; Wright P; Lengden M; Benoy T; Wilson D; Humphries G; Johnstone W
    Appl Opt; 2018 Mar; 57(7):B1-B9. PubMed ID: 29522029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image reconstruction based on L1 regularization and projection methods for electrical impedance tomography.
    Wang Q; Wang H; Zhang R; Wang J; Zheng Y; Cui Z; Yang C
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Oct; 83(10):104707. PubMed ID: 23126790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mathematical aspects of impedance imaging.
    Breckon WR; Pidcock MK
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1987; 8 Suppl A():77-84. PubMed ID: 3568575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of conductivity distribution with electrical impedance tomography based on hybrid regularization method.
    Shi Y; He X; Wang M; Yang B; Fu F; Kong X
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 May; 8(3):033503. PubMed ID: 34159221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precise two-dimensional D-bar reconstructions of human chest and phantom tank via sinc-convolution algorithm.
    Abbasi M; Naghsh-Nilchi AR
    Biomed Eng Online; 2012 Jun; 11():34. PubMed ID: 22715969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational method for estimating boundary of abdominal subcutaneous fat for absolute electrical impedance tomography.
    Yamaguchi TF; Okamoto Y
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Jan; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 28614900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.