These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36911239)

  • 1. Judicial breakfast as an external factor in judicial decision making in courts.
    Tampubolon M; Situmeang T; Saragih P
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():9. PubMed ID: 36911239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.
    Danziger S; Levav J; Avnaim-Pesso L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Apr; 108(17):6889-92. PubMed ID: 21482790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Educators as Judges: Applying Judicial Decision-Making Principles to High-Stakes Education Assessment Decisions.
    Hu WCY; Dillon HCB; Wilkinson TJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(2):168-179. PubMed ID: 35253558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Bioethical Realism': A Framework for Implementing Universal Research Ethics.
    Barugahare J
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Sep; 19(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 30080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?
    Barysė D; Sarel R
    Artif Intell Law (Dordr); 2023 Jan; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 36643574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The current judicial interpretation of the 1969 abortion law.
    Dehler D
    Cathol Hosp; 1979; 7(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 10245754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
    Buchanan A
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asserting scientific authority. Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights.
    Gardner W; Scherer D; Tester M
    Am Psychol; 1989 Jun; 44(6):895-902. PubMed ID: 2751154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The privilege and the pressure: judges' and magistrates' reflections on the sources and impacts of stress in judicial work.
    Schrever C; Hulbert C; Sourdin T
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2024; 31(3):327-380. PubMed ID: 38895730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent judicial research in the Daubert age.
    Cheng EK
    Duke Law J; 2007 Mar; 56(5):1263-318. PubMed ID: 17593589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Extralegal Factors in Decision-Making About Juvenile Offenders in Chile: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
    Carvacho P; Droppelmann C; Mateo M
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2023 Mar; 67(4):398-419. PubMed ID: 34986703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Courts as communicators: can doctors learn from judges' decisions?
    Skene L
    J Bioeth Inq; 2004; 1(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16025599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding Decision-Making in Specialized Domestic Violence Courts: Can Contemporary Theoretical Frameworks Help Guide These Decisions?
    Pinchevsky GM
    Violence Against Women; 2017 May; 23(6):749-771. PubMed ID: 27216474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Healthcare and the law: a view from the bar.
    Martland J
    Healthc Q; 2009; 12 Spec No Patient():e195-8. PubMed ID: 19667769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal decision-making and the abstract/concrete paradox.
    Struchiner N; Almeida GDFCF; Hannikainen IR
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104421. PubMed ID: 32891973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law.
    Chen DL
    Artif Intell Law (Dordr); 2019; 27(1):15-42. PubMed ID: 32255924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.