These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019. Machanahalli Balakrishna A; Ismayl M; Walters RW; Aboeata A; Gowda RM; Vallabhajosyula S; Goldsweig AM; Dahal K Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 47(9):101270. PubMed ID: 35640848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial. Kang DY; Ahn JM; Park H; Lee PH; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Kim YH; Park SW; Kim SW; Hur SH; Cho YK; Lee CH; Hong SJ; Hong YJ; Yoon YW; Kim SJ; Bae JH; Oh JH; Park DW; Park SJ Am Heart J; 2020 Oct; 228():72-80. PubMed ID: 32871327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]