These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36912503)

  • 21. Clean construction and demolition waste material cycles through optimised pre-demolition waste audit documentation: A review on building material assessment tools.
    Rašković M; Ragossnig AM; Kondracki K; Ragossnig-Angst M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):923-941. PubMed ID: 32635832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review.
    Chen J; Su Y; Si H; Chen J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30356018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Construction and demolition waste framework of circular economy: A mini review.
    Papamichael I; Voukkali I; Loizia P; Zorpas AA
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Dec; 41(12):1728-1740. PubMed ID: 37653387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of construction company size on the determining factors for construction and demolition waste management.
    Ramos M; Martinho G
    Waste Manag; 2021 Dec; 136():295-302. PubMed ID: 34735983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Current state of building demolition and potential for selective dismantling in Vietnam.
    Hoang NH; Ishigaki T; Watari T; Yamada M; Kawamoto K
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jul; 149():218-227. PubMed ID: 35752109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Overview regarding construction and demolition waste in Spain.
    Rodríguez-Robles D; García-González J; Juan-Valdés A; Morán-Del Pozo JM; Guerra-Romero MI
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):3060-70. PubMed ID: 25230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.
    Islam R; Nazifa TH; Yuniarto A; Shanawaz Uddin ASM; Salmiati S; Shahid S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():10-21. PubMed ID: 31351595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic identification of illegal construction and demolition waste landfills: A computer vision approach.
    Yong Q; Wu H; Wang J; Chen R; Yu B; Zuo J; Du L
    Waste Manag; 2023 Dec; 172():267-277. PubMed ID: 37925929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sustainability assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste management applied to an Italian case.
    Iodice S; Garbarino E; Cerreta M; Tonini D
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jun; 128():83-98. PubMed ID: 33975139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is Policy the Necessary or Sufficient Driving Force of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry Development? Experience from China.
    Li J; Ji J; Zuo J; Tan Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    Haider H; AlMarshod SY; AlSaleem SS; Ali AAM; Alinizzi M; Alresheedi MT; Shafiquzzaman M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decision making behaviours and management mechanisms for construction and demolition waste recycling based on public-private partnership.
    Lu W; Du L; Feng Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(54):82078-82097. PubMed ID: 35748991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-benefit analysis of demolition waste management via agent-based modelling: A case study in Shenzhen.
    Ding Z; Cao X; Wang Y; Wu H; Zuo J; Zillante G
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():169-178. PubMed ID: 34785435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Critical review of the recovery rates of construction and demolition waste in the European Union - An analysis of influencing factors in selected EU countries.
    Moschen-Schimek J; Kasper T; Huber-Humer M
    Waste Manag; 2023 Jul; 167():150-164. PubMed ID: 37267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Willingness to pay for construction and demolition waste from buildings in Chile.
    Véliz KD; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Ossio F
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():222-230. PubMed ID: 34800746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A web-based Decision Support System for the optimal management of construction and demolition waste.
    Banias G; Achillas Ch; Vlachokostas Ch; Moussiopoulos N; Papaioannou I
    Waste Manag; 2011 Dec; 31(12):2497-502. PubMed ID: 21835602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Financial and economic evaluation of construction and demolition waste recycling in Hanoi, Vietnam.
    Hoang NH; Ishigaki T; Kubota R; Tong TK; Nguyen TT; Nguyen HG; Yamada M; Kawamoto K
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jul; 131():294-304. PubMed ID: 34198183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Demolition waste recycling in China: New evidence from a demolition project for highway development.
    Zhang Y; Tan W
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 32077383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Construction waste modelling for residential construction projects in New Zealand to enhance design outcomes.
    Domingo N; Batty T
    Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 120():484-493. PubMed ID: 33191050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolutionary game model of construction enterprises and construction material manufacturers in the construction and demolition waste resource utilization.
    Shao Z; Li M; Han C; Meng L
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Feb; 41(2):477-495. PubMed ID: 36134682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.