These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36913192)

  • 21. Comparison of k
    de Prez L; de Pooter J; Jansen B; Perik T; Wittkämper F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045023. PubMed ID: 29461974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation.
    Wang Y; Easterling SB; Ting JY
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3758. PubMed ID: 22955642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo-based investigations on the impact of removing the flattening filter on beam quality specifiers for photon beam dosimetry.
    Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 28369978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Ion Recombination Correction for Indigenously Developed Farmer Ion Chamber in Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams.
    Patwe PT; Deshpande SS; Mahajan GR
    J Med Phys; 2024; 49(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 39131423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of ICRU report 90 recommendations on Monte Carlo calculated k
    Kawachi T; Saitoh H; Katayose T; Tohyama N; Miyasaka R; Cho SY; Iwase T; Hara R
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5185-5194. PubMed ID: 31386762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams.
    Casar B; Gershkevitsh E; Mendez I; Jurković S; Huq MS
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):944-963. PubMed ID: 30521073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CyberKnife reference dosimetry: An assessment of the impact of evolving recommendations on correction factors and measured dose.
    Buchegger N; Grogan G; Hug B; Oliver C; Ebert M
    Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3573-3585. PubMed ID: 32311095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Properties of IBA Razor Nano Chamber in small-field radiation therapy using 6 MV FF, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF photon beams.
    Partanen M; Niemelä J; Ojala J; Keyriläinen J; Kapanen M
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):1419-1424. PubMed ID: 34596486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of an aSi-EPID with flattening filter free beams: applicability to the GLAaS algorithm for portal dosimetry and first experience for pretreatment QA of RapidArc.
    Nicolini G; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Fenoglietto P; Cozzi L; Fogliata A
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111719. PubMed ID: 24320427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Equivalent (uniform) square field sizes of flattening filter free photon beams.
    Lechner W; Kuess P; Georg D; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7694-7713. PubMed ID: 28771143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. TG-51 reference dosimetry for the Halcyon™: A clinical experience.
    Lloyd SAM; Lim TY; Fave X; Flores-Martinez E; Atwood TF; Moiseenko V
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 19(4):98-102. PubMed ID: 29785729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
    Cashmore J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):293-307. PubMed ID: 27685127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surface and build-up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening-filter-free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water-equivalent phantom.
    Imae T; Takenaka S; Watanabe Y; Aoki A; Matsuda K; Sasaki K; Saegusa S; Nawa K; Nakagawa K; Abe O
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):334-339. PubMed ID: 33184970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy electron beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Röser A; Flatten V; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2024 Jan; 117():103179. PubMed ID: 38042061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the Impact of Ionization Chamber-Specific Beam Quality Correction Factor in Dosimetry of Filtered and Unfiltered Photon Beams.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Agarwal P; Avasthi DK; Verma R
    J Med Phys; 2022; 47(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 36212211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monte Carlo simulation of beam characteristics from small fields based on TrueBeam flattening-filter-free mode.
    Feng Z; Yue H; Zhang Y; Wu H; Cheng J; Su X
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Feb; 11():30. PubMed ID: 26921246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ion-recombination correction for different ionization chambers in high dose rate flattening-filter-free photon beams.
    Lang S; Hrbacek J; Leong A; Klöck S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(9):2819-27. PubMed ID: 22510780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs.
    Hermida-López M; Sánchez-Artuñedo D; Calvo-Ortega JF
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):144. PubMed ID: 30086767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calculated beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in MV photon beams.
    Tikkanen J; Zink K; Pimpinella M; Teles P; Borbinha J; Ojala J; Siiskonen T; Gomà C; Pinto M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(7):075003. PubMed ID: 31995531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.