These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36913824)

  • 21. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distractor probability influences suppression in auditory selective attention.
    Daly HR; Pitt MA
    Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104849. PubMed ID: 34332212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical learning of spatiotemporal regularities dynamically guides visual attention across space.
    Xu Z; Theeuwes J; Los SA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1054-1072. PubMed ID: 36207663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.
    Britton MK; Anderson BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31886698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is the Role of Spatial Attention in Statistical Learning During Visual Search?
    Golan A; Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):52. PubMed ID: 39005952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
    Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is perceptual learning always better at task-relevant locations? It depends on the distractors.
    Singhal I; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):992-1003. PubMed ID: 35217980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural mechanisms underlying distractor inhibition on the basis of feature and/or spatial expectations.
    van Moorselaar D; Daneshtalab N; Slagter HA
    Cortex; 2021 Apr; 137():232-250. PubMed ID: 33640854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning to suppress a distractor may not be unconscious.
    Vicente-Conesa F; Giménez-Fernández T; Luque D; Vadillo MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):796-813. PubMed ID: 36417127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.
    Wang B; van Driel J; Ort E; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 31(10):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 31180265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.
    Goschy H; Bakos S; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1195. PubMed ID: 25414676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical learning of across-trial regularities during serial search.
    Li AS; Bogaerts L; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):262-274. PubMed ID: 35238597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Learned feature regularities enable suppression of spatially overlapping stimuli.
    Thayer DD; Miller M; Giesbrecht B; Sprague TC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):769-784. PubMed ID: 36417129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J; Bogaerts L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2437-2451. PubMed ID: 37491558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
    Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages.
    Qiu N; Zhang B; Allenmark F; Nasemann J; Tsai SY; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14351. PubMed ID: 37277926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.