These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36914294)

  • 1. EXTRA-SHORT IMPLANTS MAY BE A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO LONGER IMPLANTS WITH BONE AUGMENTATION IN ATROPHIC MAXILLARY AND MANDIBULAR RIDGES.
    Radi IA; Hytham A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Mar; 23(1):101800. PubMed ID: 36914294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Soardi E; Corvino V; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 22866291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone?
    Esposito M; Cannizarro G; Soardi E; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.
    Esposito M; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 21594216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.
    Esposito M; Buti J; Barausse C; Gasparro R; Sammartino G; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 31535097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate Loading of Fixed Partial Dental Prostheses on Extra-Short and Short Implants in Patients with Severe Atrophy of the Posterior Maxilla or Mandible: An Up-to-4-year Clinical Study.
    Amato F; Polara G; Spedicato GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):607-615. PubMed ID: 32406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
    Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Altaib FH; Alqutaibi AY; Al-Fahd A; Eid S
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):636-650. PubMed ID: 31372602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short implants without bone augmentation vs. long implants with bone augmentation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bitinas D; Bardijevskyt G
    Aust Dent J; 2021 Mar; 66 Suppl 1():S71-S81. PubMed ID: 34037243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Chen S; Ou Q; Wang Y; Lin X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 31295755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short Dental Implants (≤ 6 mm) to Rehabilitate Severe Mandibular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.
    Carosi P; Lorenzi C; Laureti M; Ferrigno N; Arcuri C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 33600520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months.
    Raghoebar GM; Timmenga NM; Reintsema H; Stegenga B; Vissink A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 11359486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.