These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36914395)

  • 1. Progress of Keystroke Dynamics in Deception Research.
    Nan TY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 38(6):783-787. PubMed ID: 36914395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polygraph testing and sexual abuse: the lure of the magic lasso.
    Cross TP; Saxe L
    Child Maltreat; 2001 Aug; 6(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 11471627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polygraph testing for deception in Australia: effective aid to crime investigation and adjudication?
    McMahon M
    J Law Med; 2003 Aug; 11(1):24-47. PubMed ID: 14526725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Science and the CQT polygraph. A theoretical critique.
    Saxe L
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 1954162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-trial lie detection using a combined fNIRS-polygraph system.
    Bhutta MR; Hong MJ; Kim YH; Hong KS
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():709. PubMed ID: 26082733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial psychophysiology in forensic investigation: A novel idea for deception detection.
    Samuel SG; Chatterjee T; Thapliyal H; Kacker P
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2019; 11(2):90-94. PubMed ID: 32082044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Technical development of detecting deception].
    Zhao H; Kang M
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 23(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 17330762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thermal image analysis for polygraph testing.
    Pavlidis I; Levine J
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):56-64. PubMed ID: 12613212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information.
    MacNeill AL; Bradley MT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polygraph screening. Panel seeks truth in lie detector debate.
    Holden C
    Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5506):967. PubMed ID: 11232574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive and emotional aspects of polygraph diagnostic procedures: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Elaad E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 25093905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy.
    Kokish R; Levenson JS; Blasingame GD
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Apr; 17(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 15974426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Credibility assessment: preliminary process theory, the polygraph process, and construct validity.
    Palmatier JJ; Rovner L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 24933412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hypnosis as related to the scientific detection of deception by polygraph examination: a pilot study.
    GERMANN AC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1961 Oct; 9():309-11. PubMed ID: 13897997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception.
    Timm HW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 May; 32(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 3598524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting deception: the promise and the reality of voice stress analysis.
    Horvath F
    J Forensic Sci; 1982 Apr; 27(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 7047675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The comparison question polygraph test: a contrast of methods and scoring.
    Honts CR; Reavy R
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():15-26. PubMed ID: 25703188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.