These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36914421)
1. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times. Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs. Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis. Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal. Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review. Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center. Bosio A; Alessandria E; Gozzo C; Vercelli E; Micai L; Bertello G; Pasquale G; Sedigh O; Oderda M; Biancone L; Gontero P Clin Transplant; 2024 May; 38(5):e15321. PubMed ID: 38716774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes. Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices. Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility. Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis. Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures. Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents. Lai D; Chen M; Zha S; Wan S BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28431538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of Single-Use Urologic Endoscopy: Benchtop and Initial Clinical Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope. Whelan P; Kim C; Tabib C; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 34235971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes. Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical significance of ureteral stent removal by flexible cystoscopy on pain and satisfaction in young males: a prospective randomised control trial. Jeong YB; Doo AR; Park HS; Shin YS Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 26520434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study. Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]