137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36914421)
1. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use
Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y
J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal.
Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center.
Bosio A; Alessandria E; Gozzo C; Vercelli E; Micai L; Bertello G; Pasquale G; Sedigh O; Oderda M; Biancone L; Gontero P
Clin Transplant; 2024 May; 38(5):e15321. PubMed ID: 38716774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use
Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD
J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.
Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.
Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK
Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures.
Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.
Lai D; Chen M; Zha S; Wan S
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28431538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of Single-Use Urologic Endoscopy: Benchtop and Initial Clinical Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope.
Whelan P; Kim C; Tabib C; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 34235971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.
Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB
J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical significance of ureteral stent removal by flexible cystoscopy on pain and satisfaction in young males: a prospective randomised control trial.
Jeong YB; Doo AR; Park HS; Shin YS
Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 26520434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.
Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
