These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36915548)

  • 21. Face Perception and Test Reliabilities in Congenital Prosopagnosia in Seven Tests.
    Esins J; Schultz J; Stemper C; Kennerknecht I; Bülthoff I
    Iperception; 2016; 7(1):2041669515625797. PubMed ID: 27482369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Structural attributes of the temporal lobe predict face recognition ability in youth.
    Li J; Dong M; Ren A; Ren J; Zhang J; Huang L
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():1-6. PubMed ID: 26802942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How faces (and cars) may become special.
    Sunday MA; Dodd MD; Tomarken AJ; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():202-212. PubMed ID: 30243641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developmental Perceptual Impairments: Cases When Tone-Deafness and Prosopagnosia Co-occur.
    Paquette S; Li HC; Corrow SL; Buss SS; Barton JJS; Schlaug G
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():438. PubMed ID: 30425629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impaired face recognition is associated with abnormal gray matter volume in the posterior cingulate cortex in congenital amusia.
    Jin Z; Lu X; Huyang S; Yan Y; Jiang L; Wang J; Xu M; Li Q; Wu D
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jun; 156():107833. PubMed ID: 33757844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Applied screening tests for the detection of superior face recognition.
    Bate S; Frowd C; Bennetts R; Hasshim N; Murray E; Bobak AK; Wills H; Richards S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018 Dec; 3():22. PubMed ID: 30009252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Twenty Item Prosopagnosia Index (PI20) provides meaningful evidence of face recognition impairment.
    Tsantani M; Vestner T; Cook R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 8(11):202062. PubMed ID: 34737872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults.
    Boutet I; Meinhardt-Injac B
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jul; 6(1):48. PubMed ID: 34275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prevalence of face recognition deficits in middle childhood.
    Bennetts RJ; Murray E; Boyce T; Bate S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Feb; 70(2):234-258. PubMed ID: 26999413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The 20-item prosopagnosia index (PI20): a self-report instrument for identifying developmental prosopagnosia.
    Shah P; Gaule A; Sowden S; Bird G; Cook R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Jun; 2(6):140343. PubMed ID: 26543567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).
    Cho SJ; Wilmer J; Herzmann G; McGugin RW; Fiset D; Van Gulick AE; Ryan KF; Gauthier I
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):552-66. PubMed ID: 25642930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants.
    Bate S; Dudfield G
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6330. PubMed ID: 30723622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: the example of face recognition.
    Wilmer JB; Germine L; Chabris CF; Chatterjee G; Gerbasi M; Nakayama K
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):360-92. PubMed ID: 23428079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Individual differences in face identity processing.
    McCaffery JM; Robertson DJ; Young AW; Burton AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018 Dec; 3():21. PubMed ID: 30009251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. General and specific factors in the processing of faces.
    Verhallen RJ; Bosten JM; Goodbourn PT; Lawrance-Owen AJ; Bargary G; Mollon JD
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():217-227. PubMed ID: 28077292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Face recognition performance of individuals with Asperger syndrome on the Cambridge Face Memory Test.
    Hedley D; Brewer N; Young R
    Autism Res; 2011 Dec; 4(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 22162360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Face individual identity recognition: a potential endophenotype in autism.
    Minio-Paluello I; Porciello G; Pascual-Leone A; Baron-Cohen S
    Mol Autism; 2020 Oct; 11(1):81. PubMed ID: 33081830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration on face recognition performance.
    Taylor DJ; Smith ND; Binns AM; Crabb DP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 256(4):815-821. PubMed ID: 29484559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The rise and fall of face recognition awareness across the life span.
    DeGutis J; Yosef B; Lee EA; Saad E; Arizpe J; Song JS; Wilmer J; Germine L; Esterman M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 36395052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.