These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36916781)

  • 1. Preparation facilitates response inhibition based on a stop-signal task.
    Jia LX; Li SC; Cui JF; Liu JL; Guo XX; Wang Y
    Psych J; 2023 Jun; 12(3):464-466. PubMed ID: 36916781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No training effects of top-down controlled response inhibition by practicing on the stop-signal task.
    You Y; Failla A; van der Kamp J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 May; 235():103878. PubMed ID: 36913850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task.
    Hall A; Jenkinson N; MacDonald HJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Nov; 240(11):3061-3072. PubMed ID: 36239740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.
    He JL; Hirst RJ; Puri R; Coxon J; Byblow W; Hinder M; Skippen P; Matzke D; Heathcote A; Wadsley CG; Silk T; Hyde C; Parmar D; Pedapati E; Gilbert DL; Huddleston DA; Mostofsky S; Leunissen I; MacDonald HJ; Chowdhury NS; Gretton M; Nikitenko T; Zandbelt B; Strickland L; Puts NAJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1530-1540. PubMed ID: 34751923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Time Series-Based Point Estimation of Stop Signal Reaction Times: More Evidence on the Role of Reactive Inhibition-Proactive Inhibition Interplay on the SSRT Estimations.
    Soltanifar M; Knight K; Dupuis A; Schachar R; Escobar M
    Brain Sci; 2020 Aug; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32872438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements.
    Federico P; Mirabella G
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 232(4):1293-307. PubMed ID: 24477763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of go/no-go task performance implemented in the left hemisphere.
    Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Watanabe T; Jimura K; Kunimatsu A; Abe O; Ohtomo K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 32(26):9059-65. PubMed ID: 22745505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies.
    Verbruggen F; Chambers CD; Logan GD
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Mar; 24(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 23399493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maturational trajectories of white matter microstructure underlying the right presupplementary motor area reflect individual improvements in motor response cancellation in children and adolescents.
    Madsen KS; Johansen LB; Thompson WK; Siebner HR; Jernigan TL; Baaré WFC
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():117105. PubMed ID: 32615252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques.
    Middlebrooks PG; Schall JD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 24306985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task.
    Montalti M; Calbi M; Cuccio V; Umiltà MA; Gallese V
    Psychol Res; 2023 Feb; 87(1):339-352. PubMed ID: 33905001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.
    Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motivational influences on response inhibition measures.
    Leotti LA; Wager TD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):430-47. PubMed ID: 20364928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ERP study on proactive and reactive response inhibition in individuals with schizotypy.
    Jia LX; Qin XJ; Cui JF; Zheng Q; Yang TX; Wang Y; Chan RCK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8394. PubMed ID: 33863942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voluntarily-generated unimanual preparation is associated with stopping success: evidence from LRP and lateralized mu ERD before the stop signal.
    Ko YT; Cheng SK; Juan CH
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 24718558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance monitoring and stop signal inhibition in abstinent patients with cocaine dependence.
    Li CS; Milivojevic V; Kemp K; Hong K; Sinha R
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2006 Dec; 85(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 16725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working Memory Load Selectively Influences Response Inhibition in a Stop Signal Task.
    Boucher L; Viparina B; Collins WM
    Psychol Rep; 2021 Jun; 124(3):1268-1281. PubMed ID: 32515276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive Modeling Suggests That Attentional Failures Drive Longer Stop-Signal Reaction Time Estimates in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Weigard A; Heathcote A; Matzke D; Huang-Pollock C
    Clin Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(4):856-872. PubMed ID: 32047706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face the (trigger) failure: Trigger failures strongly drive the effect of reward on response inhibition.
    Doekemeijer RA; Verbruggen F; Boehler CN
    Cortex; 2021 Jun; 139():166-177. PubMed ID: 33873037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.