BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36917260)

  • 61. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review.
    Gastounioti A; Desai S; Ahluwalia VS; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Feb; 24(1):14. PubMed ID: 35184757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Interval Breast Cancers Versus Screen Detected Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Ambinder EB; Lee E; Nguyen DL; Gong AJ; Haken OJ; Visvanathan K
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S154-S160. PubMed ID: 36739227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Assessing Breast Cancer Risk by Combining AI for Lesion Detection and Mammographic Texture.
    Lauritzen AD; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230227. PubMed ID: 37642571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?
    Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X;
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
    Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Differences and similarities in false interpretations by AI CAD and radiologists in screening mammography.
    Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Smith K; Strand F
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 96(1151):20230210. PubMed ID: 37660400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The impact of breast density notification on rescreening rates within a population-based mammographic screening program.
    Pirikahu S; Lund H; Cadby G; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):5. PubMed ID: 35033155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting interval cancers in the national screening program of a middle-income country.
    Çelik L; Aribal E
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Jul; 79(7):e885-e891. PubMed ID: 38649312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A; Young K; Egge E; Jebsen I; Sager EM; Scheel B; Søvik E; Ertzaas AK; Hofvind S; Abdelnoor M
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):679-89. PubMed ID: 16372686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers.
    Eriksson L; Czene K; Rosenberg LU; Törnberg S; Humphreys K; Hall P
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):R48. PubMed ID: 23786804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: experience of use of the ScreenPoint Medical Transpara system in 310 Japanese women.
    Sasaki M; Tozaki M; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Yotsumoto D; Ichiki Y; Terawaki A; Oosako S; Sagara Y; Sagara Y
    Breast Cancer; 2020 Jul; 27(4):642-651. PubMed ID: 32052311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
    Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
    Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density.
    Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidrich J; Hense HW; Heidinger O
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2744-2751. PubMed ID: 27822617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
    Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.