BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36917309)

  • 1. Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis of 224 patients.
    Wong KC; Lee KF; Lo EYJ; Fung AKY; Lok HT; Cheung SYS; Ng KKC; Wong J; Lai PBS; Chong CCN
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Mar; 408(1):118. PubMed ID: 36917309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early Morbidity and Mortality after Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Propensity-Score Matched Comparison with Open Resection.
    Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Jul; 23(7):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 30377911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis.
    Goh BKP; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Cheow PC; Jeyaraj PR; Chow PKH; Ooi LLPJ; Chung AYF; Chan CY
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):560-571. PubMed ID: 34061361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis.
    Chin KM; Linn YL; Cheong CK; Koh YX; Teo JY; Chung AYF; Chan CY; Goh BKP
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Apr; 91(4):E174-E182. PubMed ID: 33719128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection.
    Han DH; Choi SH; Park EJ; Kang DR; Choi GH; Choi JS
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):735-742. PubMed ID: 26537176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).
    Yamamoto M; Kobayashi T; Oshita A; Abe T; Kohashi T; Onoe T; Fukuda S; Omori I; Imaoka Y; Honmyo N; Ohdan H
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5055-5061. PubMed ID: 31828498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Prospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching to Compare Long-term Survival Outcomes After Robotic-assisted, Laparoscopic, or Open Liver Resection for Patients With BCLC Stage 0-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhu P; Liao W; Zhang WG; Chen L; Shu C; Zhang ZW; Huang ZY; Chen YF; Lau WY; Zhang BX; Chen XP
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jan; 277(1):e103-e111. PubMed ID: 35081573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minor laparoscopic liver resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma is safer than minor open resection, especially for less compensated cirrhotic patients: Propensity score analysis.
    Di Sandro S; Bagnardi V; Najjar M; Buscemi V; Lauterio A; De Carlis R; Danieli M; Pinotti E; Benuzzi L; De Carlis L
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):722-729. PubMed ID: 30449499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.
    Nomi T; Hirokawa F; Kaibori M; Ueno M; Tanaka S; Hokuto D; Noda T; Nakai T; Ikoma H; Iida H; Komeda K; Ishizaki M; Hayami S; Eguchi H; Matsumoto M; Morimura R; Maehira H; Sho M; Kubo S
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):658-666. PubMed ID: 31093748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between minimally invasive liver resection and open liver resection: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Wei D; Johnston S; Patkar A; Buell JF
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 33046367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.
    Lee DH; Kim D; Park YH; Yoon J; Kim JS
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):206-212. PubMed ID: 32532684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive versus Open Liver Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Birgin E; Kaslow SR; Hetjens S; Correa-Gallego C; Rahbari NN
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Sep; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 34638285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection criteria for minimally invasive resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-a word of caution: a propensity score matched analysis using the national cancer database.
    Salehi O; Kazakova V; Vega EA; Kutlu OC; Alarcon SV; Freeman R; Kozyreva O; Conrad C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):5382-5391. PubMed ID: 34750709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience.
    Coletta D; De Padua C; Parrino C; De Peppo V; Oddi A; Frigieri C; Grazi GL
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Oct; 30(10):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 32707003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Song DJ; Zhu K; Tan JP; Cai JB; Lv MZ; Hu J; Ding ZB; Shi GM; Ren N; Huang XW; Shi YH; Qiu SJ; Ye QH; Sun HC; Gao Q; Zhou J; Fan J; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):967-976. PubMed ID: 36076103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.
    Takahara T; Wakabayashi G; Beppu T; Aihara A; Hasegawa K; Gotohda N; Hatano E; Tanahashi Y; Mizuguchi T; Kamiyama T; Ikeda T; Tanaka S; Taniai N; Baba H; Tanabe M; Kokudo N; Konishi M; Uemoto S; Sugioka A; Hirata K; Taketomi A; Maehara Y; Kubo S; Uchida E; Miyata H; Nakamura M; Kaneko H; Yamaue H; Miyazaki M; Takada T
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Oct; 22(10):721-7. PubMed ID: 26096910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and open liver resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.
    Zhang XP; Xu S; Hu MG; Zhao ZM; Wang ZH; Zhao GD; Li CG; Tan XL; Liu R
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8132-8143. PubMed ID: 35534731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term perioperative outcomes of pure laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.
    Yoon YI; Kim KH; Cho HD; Kwon JH; Jung DH; Park GC; Song GW; Ha TY; Lee SG
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):796-805. PubMed ID: 31161292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma for various resection extent.
    Chen J; Li H; Liu F; Li B; Wei Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(12):e6460. PubMed ID: 28328863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and Efficacy of Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Di Benedetto F; Magistri P; Di Sandro S; Sposito C; Oberkofler C; Brandon E; Samstein B; Guidetti C; Papageorgiou A; Frassoni S; Bagnardi V; Clavien PA; Citterio D; Kato T; Petrowsky H; Halazun KJ; Mazzaferro V;
    JAMA Surg; 2023 Jan; 158(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 36416833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.