BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36918828)

  • 21. PTEN mutation: A potential prognostic factor associated with immune infiltration in endometrial carcinoma.
    Tao Y; Liang B
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Jun; 216(6):152943. PubMed ID: 32279917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A quantitative systematic review.
    D'Alessandris N; Travaglino A; Santoro A; Arciuolo D; Scaglione G; Raffone A; Inzani F; Zannoni GF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 163(2):427-432. PubMed ID: 34446267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combination of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) with sonographic and demographic characteristics in preoperative prediction of recurrence or progression of endometrial cancer.
    Eriksson LSE; Nastic D; Lindqvist PG; Imboden S; Järnbert-Pettersson H; Carlson JW; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 33314410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of metformin in the treatment of estrogen-dependent endometrial carcinoma complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and analysis of its prognosis.
    Deng Y; Wang J; Li W; Xiong W; Wang X
    J BUON; 2020; 25(3):1534-1540. PubMed ID: 32862601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of DNA Ploidy in the ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer.
    Proctor L; Pradhan M; Leung S; Cheng A; Lee CH; Soslow RA; Gilks CB; Talhouk A; McAlpine JM; Danielsen HE; Hoang LN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 146(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 28647100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expression of ER, PR, C-erbB-2 and Ki-67 in Endometrial Carcinoma and their Relationships with the Clinicopathological Features.
    Yu CG; Jiang XY; Li B; Gan L; Huang JF
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6789-94. PubMed ID: 26434913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vimentin Protein In Situ Expression Predicts Less Tumor Metastasis and Overall Better Survival of Endometrial Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Cao G; Diao X; Bai W; Zhang Y; Wang S
    Dis Markers; 2022; 2022():5240046. PubMed ID: 35320951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential impact of clinicopathological risk factors within the 2 largest ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma.
    Pasanen A; Loukovaara M; Ahvenainen T; Vahteristo P; Bützow R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0253472. PubMed ID: 34473724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. PD-L1 Expression in Endometrial Carcinoma Cells and Intratumoral Immune Cells: Differences Across Histologic and TCGA-based Molecular Subgroups.
    Pasanen A; Ahvenainen T; Pellinen T; Vahteristo P; Loukovaara M; Bützow R
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 31651527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts.
    Stelloo E; Nout RA; Osse EM; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IJ; Jobsen JJ; Lutgens LC; van der Steen-Banasik EM; Nijman HW; Putter H; Bosse T; Creutzberg CL; Smit VT
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Aug; 22(16):4215-24. PubMed ID: 27006490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Using Immunohistochemical Markers and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict the Prognostic Survival of Different Types of Endometrial Cancer Recurrence].
    Huang Z; Jiang P; Jia MZ; Li L; Deng Y; Lai L; Hu ZY
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 May; 52(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 34018370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma prognostic immunohistochemistry markers in the context of molecular classification.
    Karnezis AN; Leung S; Magrill J; McConechy MK; Yang W; Chow C; Kobel M; Lee CH; Huntsman DG; Talhouk A; Kommoss F; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
    J Pathol Clin Res; 2017 Oct; 3(4):279-293. PubMed ID: 29085668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decreased expression of TFAP2B in endometrial cancer predicts poor prognosis: A study based on TCGA data.
    Wu H; Zhang J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):592-597. PubMed ID: 29602546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The clinicopathological characteristics of POLE-mutated/ultramutated endometrial carcinoma and prognostic value of POLE status: a meta-analysis based on 49 articles incorporating 12,120 patients.
    Wu Q; Zhang N; Xie X
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1157. PubMed ID: 36357827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical application of adult comorbidity evaluation-27 in endometrial cancer].
    Tian WY; Wang YM; Yan Y; Gao JP; Sun DD; Jiang S; Sheng Y; Teng F; Xue FX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):810-817. PubMed ID: 27916063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Molecular classification defines outcomes and opportunities in young women with endometrial carcinoma.
    Britton H; Huang L; Lum A; Leung S; Shum K; Kale M; Burleigh A; Senz J; Yang W; McConechy M; Kommoss S; Brucker S; Talhouk A; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 30922603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The clinicopathology and survival characteristics of patients with POLE proofreading mutations in endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jumaah AS; Al-Haddad HS; McAllister KA; Yasseen AA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263585. PubMed ID: 35139130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Naples prognostic score is an independent prognostic factor in patients with operable endometrial cancer: Results from a retrospective cohort study.
    Li Q; Cong R; Wang Y; Kong F; Ma J; Wu Q; Ma X
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 33081984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer.
    Vrede SW; van Weelden WJ; Visser NCM; Bulten J; van der Putten LJM; van de Vijver K; Santacana M; Colas E; Gil-Moreno A; Moiola CP; Mancebo G; Krakstad C; Trovik J; Haldorsen IS; Huvila J; Koskas M; Weinberger V; Bednarikova M; Hausnerova J; van der Wurff AA; Matias-Guiu X; Amant F; ; Snijders MPLM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Reijnen C; Pijnenborg JMA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 161(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 33858677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. TCGA molecular groups of endometrial cancer: Pooled data about prognosis.
    Raffone A; Travaglino A; Mascolo M; Carbone L; Guida M; Insabato L; Zullo F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 155(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 31472940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.