These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36919403)

  • 1. Using dichotomized survival data to construct a prior distribution for a Bayesian seamless Phase II/III clinical trial.
    Duputel B; Stallard N; Montestruc F; Zohar S; Ursino M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 May; 32(5):963-977. PubMed ID: 36919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian group sequential designs for phase III emergency medicine trials: a case study using the PARAMEDIC2 trial.
    Ryan EG; Stallard N; Lall R; Ji C; Perkins GD; Gates S
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):84. PubMed ID: 31937351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized Bayesian optimal phase II design with binary endpoint.
    Ding Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Mar; 33(2):151-166. PubMed ID: 35793222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian optimal phase II clinical trial design with time-to-event endpoint.
    Zhou H; Chen C; Sun L; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):776-786. PubMed ID: 32524679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpreting a Bayesian phase II futility clinical trial.
    Beall J; Cassarly C; Martin R
    Trials; 2022 Nov; 23(1):953. PubMed ID: 36414953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data.
    Sambucini V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seamless phase 2/3 design for trials with multiple co-primary endpoints using Bayesian predictive power.
    Yang J; Li G; Yang D; Wu J; Wang J; Gao X; Liu P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):12. PubMed ID: 38233758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective.
    Arjas E; Gasbarra D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):50. PubMed ID: 35184731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Systematic Review of Adaptive Seamless Clinical Trials for Late-Phase Oncology Development.
    Broglio K; Cooner F; Wu Y; Xiao M; Xue XQ; Lowen M; Ikhapoh I; He P
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2024 Sep; 58(5):917-929. PubMed ID: 38861131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.
    Richert L; Doussau A; Lelièvre JD; Arnold V; Rieux V; Bouakane A; Lévy Y; Chêne G; Thiébaut R;
    Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24571662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?
    Ryan EG; Brock K; Gates S; Slade D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):150. PubMed ID: 32522284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian single-arm phase II trial designs with time-to-event endpoints.
    Wu J; Pan H; Hsu CW
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1235-1248. PubMed ID: 34085764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Bayesian adaptive designs to improve phase III trials: a respiratory care example.
    Ryan EG; Bruce J; Metcalfe AJ; Stallard N; Lamb SE; Viele K; Young D; Gates S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):99. PubMed ID: 31088354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian adaptive designs for multi-arm trials: an orthopaedic case study.
    Ryan EG; Lamb SE; Williamson E; Gates S
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 31937341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs.
    Stallard N; Todd S; Ryan EG; Gates S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31910813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian and frequentist approaches to sequential monitoring for futility in oncology basket trials: A comparison of Simon's two-stage design and Bayesian predictive probability monitoring with information sharing across baskets.
    Kaizer A; Zabor E; Nie L; Hobbs B
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272367. PubMed ID: 35917296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts.
    Bretz F; Schmidli H; König F; Racine A; Maurer W
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):623-34. PubMed ID: 16972714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine A; Maurer W
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 16972715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.