162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3692072)
1. [Physiologic limitations of dual chamber stimulators during physical activity].
Rossi P; Occhetta E; Prando MD; Magnani A; Perucca A; Rognoni G; Aina F
G Ital Cardiol; 1987 Aug; 17(8):673-9. PubMed ID: 3692072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Sick sinus syndrome: comparative study of atrial and ventricular stimulation tests].
Blanc JJ; Boschat J; Bineau P; Penther P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1983 Aug; 76(8):902-8. PubMed ID: 6414424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Atrial rate and increased work capacity during DDD pacing in patients with a high level atrioventricular block].
Doupal V; Lukl J; Heinc P
Cor Vasa; 1993; 35(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 8403940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome: the role of retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction.
Kolk R; Samarütel J; Väli J
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1994; 83(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 7857066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heart rate variability in patients suffering from structural heart disease and decreased AV-nodal conduction capacity. Insights into the formation of heart rate variability.
Schwab JO; Eichner G; Schmitt H; Schrickel J; Yang A; Balta O; Lüderitz B; Lewalter T
Z Kardiol; 2004 Mar; 93(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 15024591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].
Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Relative contribution of standard and physiologic stimulation for maximal work capacity in patients with complete atrioventricular block].
Lukl J; Heinc P
Vnitr Lek; 1992 Feb; 38(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 1595197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.
De Sisti A; Attuel P; Manot S; Fiorello P; Halimi F; Leclercq JF
Europace; 2000 Oct; 2(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 11194597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of force--frequency relation during AV-block, sinus node block and beta-adrenoceptor block in conscious animals.
De Pauw M; Vilaine JP; Heyndrickx GR
Basic Res Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 99(5):360-71. PubMed ID: 15338245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acquired atrioventricular block in a patient with sinus node disease on single-chamber atrial pacing.
Vijayvergiya R; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(4):435-6. PubMed ID: 12462677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Europace; 1999 Apr; 1(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 11228853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Haemodynamic and oxymetric investigations on patients under rate-responsive dual-chamber stimulation during exercise.
Weinhold C; Fülle P; Markewitz A; Steinbeck G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 40(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 1485316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.
Tripp IG; Armstrong GP; Stewart JT; Hood MA; Smith WM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 15826261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hemodynamics and M mode echocardiography of the consequences of ventriculo-atrial conduction in the human].
Daubert JC; Roussel A; Langella B; de Place C; Besson C; Gouffault J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Apr; 77(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 6426428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AAIsafeR limits ventricular pacing in unselected patients.
Pioger G; Leny G; Nitzsché R; Ripart A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 17302721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
