These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36921374)

  • 1. Review: Recent advancements and moving trends in chemical analysis of fire debris.
    Low Y; Tyrrell E; Gillespie E; Quigley C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Apr; 345():111623. PubMed ID: 36921374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of an HS-MS for the detection of ignitable liquids from fire debris.
    Ferreiro-González M; Ayuso J; Álvarez JA; Palma M; Barroso CG
    Talanta; 2015 Sep; 142():150-6. PubMed ID: 26003705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample preparation for the analysis of fire debris - Past and present.
    Kerr TJ
    J Sep Sci; 2018 Nov; 41(21):4055-4066. PubMed ID: 30194809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Research progress on interference in the identification of accelerants in a fire scene].
    Yin G; Qian P; Liqiu F; Jin J; Liu L; Zhang J
    Se Pu; 2022 May; 40(5):401-408. PubMed ID: 35477999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a headspace solid-phase microextraction method for the analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris.
    Fettig I; Krüger S; Deubel JH; Werrel M; Raspe T; Piechotta C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 24329005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical tools for the analysis of fire debris. A review: 2008-2015.
    Martín-Alberca C; Ortega-Ojeda FE; García-Ruiz C
    Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Jul; 928():1-19. PubMed ID: 27251852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of gasoline in fire debris using machine learning: Part I, application of random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine, and naïve bayes.
    Bogdal C; Schellenberg R; Höpli O; Bovens M; Lory M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111146. PubMed ID: 34968789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of gasoline in fire debris using machine learning: Part II, application of a neural network.
    Bogdal C; Schellenberg R; Lory M; Bovens M; Höpli O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111177. PubMed ID: 35065332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic application of gas chromatography-differential mobility spectrometry with two-way classification of ignitable liquids from fire debris.
    Lu Y; Harrington PB
    Anal Chem; 2007 Sep; 79(17):6752-9. PubMed ID: 17683164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.
    Frysinger GS; Gaines RB
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 12051325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Fire Suppression Agents and Weathering in the Analysis of Fire Debris by HS-MS eNose.
    Falatová B; Ferreiro-González M; Martín-Alberca C; Kačíková D; Galla Š; Palma M; G Barroso C
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jun; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 29899213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel method based on ion mobility spectrometry sum spectrum for the characterization of ignitable liquids in fire debris.
    Aliaño-González MJ; Ferreiro-González M; Barbero GF; Palma M
    Talanta; 2019 Jul; 199():189-194. PubMed ID: 30952245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forensic investigation of arson residue by infrared and Raman spectroscopy: From conventional to non-destructive techniques.
    Yadav VK; Nigam K; Srivastava A
    Med Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 60(3):206-215. PubMed ID: 32279580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class-conditional feature modeling for ignitable liquid classification with substantial substrate contribution in fire debris analysis.
    Lopatka M; Sigman ME; Sjerps MJ; Williams MR; Vivó-Truyols G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jul; 252():177-86. PubMed ID: 26005858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of analytical techniques for arson residues.
    Pert AD; Baron MG; Birkett JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Sep; 51(5):1033-49. PubMed ID: 17018079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid GC-MS as a Screening Tool for Forensic Fire Debris Analysis.
    Capistran BA; Sisco E
    Forensic Chem; 2022 Sep; 30():. PubMed ID: 36733494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acid alteration of several ignitable liquids of potential use in arsons.
    Martín-Alberca C; Carrascosa H; San Román I; Bartolomé L; García-Ruiz C
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jan; 58(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 29332697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of Ignitable Liquid Residues in Burned Petroleum-Derived Substrates by Using HS-MS eNose and Chemometrics.
    Falatová B; Ferreiro-González M; P Calle JL; Álvarez JÁ; Palma M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent advances in the applications of forensic science to fire debris analysis.
    Dolan J
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2003 Aug; 376(8):1168-71. PubMed ID: 12736769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of Ignitable Liquids in Fire Debris: Direct Analysis by Electronic Nose.
    Ferreiro-González M; Barbero GF; Palma M; Ayuso J; Álvarez JA; Barroso CG
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 May; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 27187407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.