119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36921747)
1. Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Attention Bias Towards Pain: Evidence From a Drift-Diffusion Model and Event-Related Potentials.
Zhang Y; Ye Q; He H; Jin R; Peng W
J Pain; 2023 Jul; 24(7):1307-1320. PubMed ID: 36921747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Event related potentials during covert orientation of visual attention: effects of cue validity and directionality.
Wright MJ; Geffen GM; Geffen LB
Biol Psychol; 1995 Oct; 41(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 8534791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hypervigilance to learned pain signals: a componential analysis.
Van Damme S; Crombez G; Eccleston C; Koster EH
J Pain; 2006 May; 7(5):346-57. PubMed ID: 16632324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task.
Golob EJ; Pratt H; Starr A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Oct; 113(10):1544-57. PubMed ID: 12350430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Common modules for processing invalidly cued events in the human cortex.
Mattler U; Wüstenberg T; Heinze HJ
Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):128-41. PubMed ID: 16859648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pushing attention to one side: Force field adaptation alters neural correlates of orienting and disengagement of spatial attention.
Reuter EM; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R; Riek S; Carroll TJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):120-136. PubMed ID: 30408253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.
Eimer M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(5):408-20. PubMed ID: 7691565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention shifting and subliminal cueing under high attentional load: an EEG study using emotional faces.
Tipura E; Renaud O; Pegna AJ
Neuroreport; 2019 Dec; 30(18):1251-1255. PubMed ID: 31609828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prism Adaptation Alters Electrophysiological Markers of Attentional Processes in the Healthy Brain.
Martín-Arévalo E; Laube I; Koun E; Farnè A; Reilly KT; Pisella L
J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):1019-30. PubMed ID: 26791229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expectancy and attention bias to spiders: Dissecting anticipation and allocation processes using ERPs.
Abado E; Aue T; Pourtois G; Okon-Singer H
Psychophysiology; 2024 Jun; 61(6):e14546. PubMed ID: 38406863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information.
Kessels LT; Ruiter RA; Jansma BM
Health Psychol; 2010 Jul; 29(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 20658820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Target processing is facilitated by motivationally relevant cues.
Briggs KE; Martin FH
Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18262710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities.
Hugdahl K; Nordby H
Behav Neural Biol; 1994 Jul; 62(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 7945141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When experience with scenes foils attentional orienting: ERP evidence against flexible target-context mapping in visual search.
Zinchenko A; Geyer T; Zang X; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Conci M
Cortex; 2024 Jun; 175():41-53. PubMed ID: 38703715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.
Lai G; Mangels JA
Neuropsychologia; 2007 May; 45(9):2038-50. PubMed ID: 17382975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural processes underlying the orienting of attention without awareness.
Giattino CM; Alam ZM; Woldorff MG
Cortex; 2018 May; 102():14-25. PubMed ID: 28826603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wavelet analysis of the EEG during the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets.
Digiacomo MR; Marco-Pallarés J; Flores AB; Gómez CM
Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():94-103. PubMed ID: 18708032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of somatic threat feature detectors in the attentional bias toward pain: effects of spatial attention.
Dowman R
Psychophysiology; 2011 Mar; 48(3):397-409. PubMed ID: 20636292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
