BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36922062)

  • 1. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Practical Application.
    Ali ZA; Karimi Galougahi K; Thomas SV; Abu-Much A; Chau K; Dakroub A; Shlofmitz ES; Jeremias A; West N; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Maehara A; Shlofmitz RA
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 36922062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial.
    Kang DY; Ahn JM; Park H; Lee PH; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Kim YH; Park SW; Kim SW; Hur SH; Cho YK; Lee CH; Hong SJ; Hong YJ; Yoon YW; Kim SJ; Bae JH; Oh JH; Park DW; Park SJ
    Am Heart J; 2020 Oct; 228():72-80. PubMed ID: 32871327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
    Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Kang DY; Ahn JM; Yun SC; Hur SH; Cho YK; Lee CH; Hong SJ; Lim S; Kim SW; Won H; Oh JH; Choe JC; Hong YJ; Yoon YH; Kim H; Choi Y; Lee J; Yoon YW; Kim SJ; Bae JH; Park SJ; Park DW;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 83(3):401-413. PubMed ID: 37879490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions.
    Ali ZA; Karimi Galougahi K; Mintz GS; Maehara A; Shlofmitz RA; Mattesini A
    EuroIntervention; 2021 Jun; 17(2):e105-e123. PubMed ID: 34110288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Clinical Trials.
    Otake H
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 36922063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main coronary artery.
    Miura K; Tada T; Shimada T; Ohya M; Murai R; Kubo S; Tanaka H; Fuku Y; Goto T; Kadota K
    Heart Vessels; 2021 May; 36(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 33389063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019.
    Machanahalli Balakrishna A; Ismayl M; Walters RW; Aboeata A; Gowda RM; Vallabhajosyula S; Goldsweig AM; Dahal K
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 47(9):101270. PubMed ID: 35640848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Kang DY; Ahn JM; Yun SC; Hur SH; Cho YK; Lee CH; Hong SJ; Lim S; Kim SW; Won H; Oh JH; Choe JC; Hong YJ; Yoon YH; Kim H; Choi Y; Lee J; Yoon YW; Kim SJ; Bae JH; Park DW; Park SJ;
    Circulation; 2023 Oct; 148(16):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 37634092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary practices using intravascular imaging guidance with IVUS or OCT to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Nguyen P; Seto A
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2020 Feb; 18(2):103-115. PubMed ID: 32077345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical coherence tomography is a kid on the block: I would choose intravascular ultrasound.
    Dash D
    Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28648442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optical coherence tomography-versus intravascular ultrasound-guided stent expansion in calcified lesions.
    Kurogi K; Ishii M; Ikebe S; Kaichi R; Mori T; Komaki S; Yamamoto N; Yamanaga K; Arima Y; Yamamoto E; Kaikita K; Matsushita K; Tsujita K
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2022 Apr; 37(2):312-323. PubMed ID: 34097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ashraf DA; Ahmed U; Khan ZZ; Mushtaq F; Bano S; Khan AR; Azam S; Haroon A; Malik SA; Aslam R; Kumar J; Khan FZ; Faheem A; Kumar S; Hassan S
    Future Cardiol; 2024; 20(3):137-150. PubMed ID: 38623957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Practical Application.
    Sonoda S; Node K
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 36922058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization.
    Bhogal S; Hashim H; Merdler I; Aladin AI; Zhang C; Ben-Dor I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mintz GS; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():96-98. PubMed ID: 37394321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intracoronary Imaging and Physiology to Guide PCI: Are We Ready for a Class I Guideline Recommendation?
    Ya'Qoub L; Basir MB; Soni K; Zimmet J; Yang J; Shunk K; Elgendy IY; Mahtta D
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Jul; 25(7):725-734. PubMed ID: 37261666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention compared with other imaging guidance: a meta-analysis.
    Kuku KO; Ekanem E; Azizi V; Melaku G; Bui A; Meirovich YF; Dheendsa A; Beyene S; Hideo-Kajita A; Lipinski MJ; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):503-513. PubMed ID: 29151138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.