These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36922493)

  • 21. nextPYP: a comprehensive and scalable platform for characterizing protein variability in situ using single-particle cryo-electron tomography.
    Liu HF; Zhou Y; Huang Q; Piland J; Jin W; Mandel J; Du X; Martin J; Bartesaghi A
    Nat Methods; 2023 Dec; 20(12):1909-1919. PubMed ID: 37884796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perspective: Emerging strategies for determining atomic-resolution structures of macromolecular complexes within cells.
    Petrov PN; Müller H; Glaeser RM
    J Struct Biol; 2022 Mar; 214(1):107827. PubMed ID: 34915129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conical Fourier shell correlation applied to electron tomograms.
    Diebolder CA; Faas FG; Koster AJ; Koning RI
    J Struct Biol; 2015 May; 190(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 25843950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-quality, high-throughput cryo-electron microscopy data collection via beam tilt and astigmatism-free beam-image shift.
    Wu C; Huang X; Cheng J; Zhu D; Zhang X
    J Struct Biol; 2019 Dec; 208(3):107396. PubMed ID: 31562921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A cryogenic, coincident fluorescence, electron, and ion beam microscope.
    Boltje DB; Hoogenboom JP; Jakobi AJ; Jensen GJ; Jonker CTH; Kaag MJ; Koster AJ; Last MGF; de Agrela Pinto C; Plitzko JM; Raunser S; Tacke S; Wang Z; van der Wee EB; Wepf R; den Hoedt S
    Elife; 2022 Oct; 11():. PubMed ID: 36305590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cryo-Electron Tomography and Subtomogram Averaging.
    Wan W; Briggs JA
    Methods Enzymol; 2016; 579():329-67. PubMed ID: 27572733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. emClarity: software for high-resolution cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging.
    Himes BA; Zhang P
    Nat Methods; 2018 Nov; 15(11):955-961. PubMed ID: 30349041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combining high throughput and high quality for cryo-electron microscopy data collection.
    Weis F; Hagen WJH
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2020 Aug; 76(Pt 8):724-728. PubMed ID: 32744254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of protein structure at 8.5Å resolution using cryo-electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging.
    Schur FK; Hagen WJ; de Marco A; Briggs JA
    J Struct Biol; 2013 Dec; 184(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 24184468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alignment of cryo-electron tomography datasets.
    Amat F; Castaño-Diez D; Lawrence A; Moussavi F; Winkler H; Horowitz M
    Methods Enzymol; 2010; 482():343-67. PubMed ID: 20888968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying resolution limiting factors in subtomogram averaged cryo-electron tomography using simulations.
    Voortman LM; Vulović M; Maletta M; Voigt A; Franken EM; Simonetti A; Peters PJ; van Vliet LJ; Rieger B
    J Struct Biol; 2014 Aug; 187(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 24998892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated cryo-lamella preparation for high-throughput in-situ structural biology.
    Buckley G; Gervinskas G; Taveneau C; Venugopal H; Whisstock JC; de Marco A
    J Struct Biol; 2020 May; 210(2):107488. PubMed ID: 32126263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the benefits of focal pair cryo-electron tomography.
    Kudryashev M; Stahlberg H; Castaño-Díez D
    J Struct Biol; 2012 May; 178(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 22056466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current data processing strategies for cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging.
    Pyle E; Zanetti G
    Biochem J; 2021 May; 478(10):1827-1845. PubMed ID: 34003255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improved applicability and robustness of fast cryo-electron tomography data acquisition.
    Eisenstein F; Danev R; Pilhofer M
    J Struct Biol; 2019 Nov; 208(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 31425790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In Situ Imaging of Bacterial Secretion Systems by Electron Cryotomography.
    Weiss GL; Medeiros JM; Pilhofer M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1615():353-375. PubMed ID: 28667625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fine details in complex environments: the power of cryo-electron tomography.
    Hutchings J; Zanetti G
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Aug; 46(4):807-816. PubMed ID: 29934301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Streamlined structure determination by cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging using TomoBEAR.
    Balyschew N; Yushkevich A; Mikirtumov V; Sanchez RM; Sprink T; Kudryashev M
    Nat Commun; 2023 Oct; 14(1):6543. PubMed ID: 37848413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subnanometer-resolution structure determination in situ by hybrid subtomogram averaging - single particle cryo-EM.
    Sanchez RM; Zhang Y; Chen W; Dietrich L; Kudryashev M
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3709. PubMed ID: 32709843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preparation and Cryo-FIB micromachining of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Cryo-Electron Tomography.
    Moravcová J; Pinkas M; Holbová R; Nováček J
    J Vis Exp; 2021 Nov; (177):. PubMed ID: 34866622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.