These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36924711)

  • 1. Towards credible, evidence-based environmental rating ecolabels for consumer products: A proposed framework.
    Courtat M; Joyce PJ; Sim S; Sadhukhan J; Murphy R
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 336():117684. PubMed ID: 36924711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of environmental impact and nutrition labelling on food purchasing: An experimental online supermarket study.
    Potter C; Pechey R; Cook B; Bateman P; Stewart C; Frie K; Clark M; Piernas C; Rayner M; Jebb SA
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106312. PubMed ID: 36150553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online purchasing creates opportunities to lower the life cycle carbon footprints of consumer products.
    Isley SC; Stern PC; Carmichael SP; Joseph KM; Arent DJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Aug; 113(35):9780-5. PubMed ID: 27528670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ecolabeled seafood and sustainable consumption in the Canadian context: issues and insights from a survey of seafood consumers.
    Winson A; Choi JY; Hunter D; Ramsundar C
    Marit Stud; 2022; 21(1):99-113. PubMed ID: 35330987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural responses clarify how ecolabels promote sustainable purchases.
    Sawe N; Srirangarajan T; Sahoo A; Tang GS; Knutson B
    Neuroimage; 2022 Nov; 263():119668. PubMed ID: 36206938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drawing the line between sustainable and unsustainable fish: product differentiation that supports sustainable development through trade measures.
    Baumgartner U; Bürgi Bonanomi E
    Environ Sci Eur; 2021; 33(1):113. PubMed ID: 34608426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review.
    Potter C; Bastounis A; Hartmann-Boyce J; Stewart C; Frie K; Tudor K; Bianchi F; Cartwright E; Cook B; Rayner M; Jebb SA
    Environ Behav; 2021 Oct; 53(8):891-925. PubMed ID: 34456340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer perception of the sustainability of dairy products and plant-based dairy alternatives.
    Schiano AN; Harwood WS; Gerard PD; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Dec; 103(12):11228-11243. PubMed ID: 33069414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the potential of ecolabels to promote agrobiodiversity.
    van Amstel M; de Neve W; de Kraker J; Glasbergen P
    Ambio; 2007 Nov; 36(7):551-8. PubMed ID: 18074891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.
    Annunziata A; Mariani A
    Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2018; 9(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 29299996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of ecolabeling in reducing ecotoxicology.
    Chakravarthy Y; Potdar A; Singh A; Unnikrishnan S; Naik N
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Dec; 134(Pt 2):383-389. PubMed ID: 26412719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
    Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of sustainability criteria from European public procurement schemes for foodservices.
    Neto B
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 704():135300. PubMed ID: 31836237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the water footprint concept for water use efficiency labelling of consumer products: the Greek experience.
    Nydrioti I; Grigoropoulou H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):19918-19930. PubMed ID: 36242669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The consumer footprint: Monitoring sustainable development goal 12 with process-based life cycle assessment.
    Sala S; Castellani V
    J Clean Prod; 2019 Dec; 240():118050. PubMed ID: 31839697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Consumers Want More Nutritional and Health Information on Wine Labels? Insights from the EU and USA.
    Annunziata A; Pomarici E; Vecchio R; Mariani A
    Nutrients; 2016 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 27399767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.
    Lăzăroiu G; Neguriţă O; Grecu I; Grecu G; Mitran PC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():890. PubMed ID: 32499740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing Consumer Preference for Overpackaging Solutions in E-Commerce.
    Xie G; Huang L; Apostolidis C; Huang Z; Cai W; Li G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.