These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3692508)

  • 1. An improved perturbation technique for electrical impedance imaging with some criticisms.
    Yorkey TJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1987 Nov; 34(11):898-901. PubMed ID: 3692508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance tomography.
    Yorkey TJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1987 Nov; 34(11):843-52. PubMed ID: 3692503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Oh SH; Han JY; Lee SY; Cho MH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 14523975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite-element method in electrical impedance tomography.
    Woo EJ; Hua P; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1994 Sep; 32(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 7845069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast imaging using electrical impedance tomography: correlation of quantitative assessment with visual interpretation.
    Zain NM; Chelliah KK
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(3):1327-31. PubMed ID: 24606460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Bajd F; Serša I; Miklavčič D
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):985-96. PubMed ID: 24844299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical impedance tomography; the construction and application to physiological measurement of electrical impedance images.
    Brown BH; Barber DC
    Med Prog Technol; 1987; 13(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 3441245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
    Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a differential synchronous demodulator for electrical impedance tomography.
    Koukourlis CS; Trigonidis VK; Kyriakou GA; Sahalos JN; Batas K
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1992; 13 Suppl A():35-8. PubMed ID: 1587105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of image reconstruction techniques for electrical impedance tomography.
    Barber DC
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 2654593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of conformal transformation to elliptic geometry for electric impedance tomography.
    Yilmaz A; Akdoğan KE; Saka B
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Mar; 30(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 17509923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential synchronous demodulation for electrical impedance tomography.
    Koukourlis CS; Kyriakou GA; Sahalos JN
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1992; 13 Suppl A():31-4. PubMed ID: 1587104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
    Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acousto-electrical speckle pattern in Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography.
    Grasland-Mongrain P; Destrempes F; Mari JM; Souchon R; Catheline S; Chapelon JY; Lafon C; Cloutier G
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(9):3747-57. PubMed ID: 25906432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of electrical anisotropy during magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction.
    Brinker K; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1637-9. PubMed ID: 18440910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current.
    Eroğlu HH; Eyüboğlu BM
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Nov; 37(11):2024-2049. PubMed ID: 27775928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
    Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dual-frequency electrical impedance tomography system.
    Griffiths H; Zhang Z
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Oct; 34(10):1465-76. PubMed ID: 2813513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrical impedance tomography].
    Kanai H
    Nihon Rinsho; 1991 Apr; 49(4):968-74. PubMed ID: 2072561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.