These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36925266)

  • 1. Neurophysiological signatures of approximate number system acuity in preschoolers.
    Pinhas M; Paulsen DJ; Woldorff MG; Brannon EM
    Trends Neurosci Educ; 2023 Mar; 30():100197. PubMed ID: 36925266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features.
    DeWind NK; Adams GK; Platt ML; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():247-65. PubMed ID: 26056747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weaker number sense accounts for impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia: Behavioral and computational evidence.
    Dolfi S; Decarli G; Lunardon M; De Filippo De Grazia M; Gerola S; Lanfranchi S; Cossu G; Sella F; Testolin A; Zorzi M
    Dev Sci; 2024 Nov; 27(6):e13538. PubMed ID: 38949566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers' quantitative development.
    van Marle K; Chu FW; Li Y; Geary DC
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jul; 17(4):492-505. PubMed ID: 24498980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preschoolers' precision of the approximate number system predicts later school mathematics performance.
    Mazzocco MM; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23749. PubMed ID: 21935362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity.
    Chesney D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29651753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental differences in approaches to nonsymbolic comparison tasks.
    Clayton S; Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):436-445. PubMed ID: 29419356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic skill reflects the approximate number system and cannot be explained by inhibitory control.
    Malone SA; Pritchard VE; Heron-Delaney M; Burgoyne K; Lervåg A; Hulme C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Aug; 184():220-231. PubMed ID: 30935590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can training in the approximate number system improve the informal mathematics ability of preschoolers?
    Liang X; Yin Y; Kang J; Wang L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103638. PubMed ID: 35690026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Approximate Number System: no relation between numerical comparison and estimation tasks.
    Guillaume M; Gevers W; Content A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 25742706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The approximate number system and domain-general abilities as predictors of math ability in children with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Bull R; Marschark M; Nordmann E; Sapere P; Skene WA
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Jun; 36(2):236-254. PubMed ID: 28851061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.
    Price GR; Palmer D; Battista C; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 22445770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changing the precision of preschoolers' approximate number system representations changes their symbolic math performance.
    Wang JJ; Odic D; Halberda J; Feigenson L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jul; 147():82-99. PubMed ID: 27061668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What predicts mathematics achievement? Developmental change in 5- and 7-year-old children.
    Gimbert F; Camos V; Gentaz E; Mazens K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Feb; 178():104-120. PubMed ID: 30380452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training.
    Dewind NK; Brannon EM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():68. PubMed ID: 22529786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent validity of approximate number sense tasks in adults and children.
    Smets K; Gebuis T; Defever E; Reynvoet B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():120-8. PubMed ID: 24875582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and children.
    Szűcs D; Nobes A; Devine A; Gabriel FC; Gebuis T
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():444. PubMed ID: 23882245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: contributions of inhibitory control.
    Fuhs MW; McNeil NM
    Dev Sci; 2013 Jan; 16(1):136-48. PubMed ID: 23278935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults.
    Halberda J; Feigenson L
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1457-65. PubMed ID: 18793076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluency in symbolic arithmetic refines the approximate number system in parietal cortex.
    Suárez-Pellicioni M; Booth JR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Oct; 39(10):3956-3971. PubMed ID: 30024084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.