218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3692804)
1. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan: no rights violated.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 2228594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues.
Snyder L
J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients?
Emanuel EJ
Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The calculus of consent.
Scofield G
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 2312271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nancy Beth Cruzan: in no voice at all.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 2312269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prisoner in the ICU: the tragedy of William Bartling.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Dec; 14(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 6511377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment.
Hayman S
Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
