These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3692804)

  • 21. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique.
    Gorby JD
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
    Robertson ED
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
    Denbo SM
    Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The right to die.
    Powell JA; Cohen AS
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
    Liacos PJ
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
    Merritt TL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does autonomy require informed and specific refusal of life-sustaining medical treatment?
    Bradley GV; Rouse F
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(3):301-35. PubMed ID: 2613492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill?
    Emanuel EJ
    Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8577):106-8. PubMed ID: 2891943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill?
    Rizzo RF
    N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case.
    Nevins MA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
    Murphy JG
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
    Hyland WF; Baime DS
    Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
    New Jersey
    N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
    Rust M
    Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Euthanasia: where are we? Where are we going?
    Fish MS
    Leg Med; 1987; ():200-12. PubMed ID: 3504981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny.
    Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA
    Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Jersey advocate sees a peril in life-support cases.
    Sullivan JF
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.