These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality. Menceloglu M; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2732-2744. PubMed ID: 31254259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When temporal attention interacts with expectation. Duyar A; Ren S; Carrasco M Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4624. PubMed ID: 38409235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The time-course of feature-based attention effects dissociated from temporal expectation and target-related processes. Moerel D; Grootswagers T; Robinson AK; Shatek SM; Woolgar A; Carlson TA; Rich AN Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6968. PubMed ID: 35484363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases. Luque D; Vadillo MA; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1485-1503. PubMed ID: 27174735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time. Johnson KA; Bryan M; Polonowita K; Decroupet D; Coull JT Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1417. PubMed ID: 27713713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation. Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting Unattended Stimuli Depends on the Phase of Prestimulus Neural Oscillations. Harris AM; Dux PE; Mattingley JB J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(12):3092-3101. PubMed ID: 29459372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Matching cue size and task properties in exogenous attention. Burnett KE; d'Avossa G; Sapir A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2363-75. PubMed ID: 23574543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects. Milliken B; Lupiáñez J; Roberts M; Stevanovski B Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 15000534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In search of exogenous feature-based attention. Donovan I; Zhou YJ; Carrasco M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):312-329. PubMed ID: 31317395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-modal orienting of exogenous attention results in visual-cortical facilitation, not suppression. Keefe JM; Pokta E; Störmer VS Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10237. PubMed ID: 33986384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Independent effects of bottom-up temporal expectancy and top-down spatial attention. An audiovisual study using rhythmic cueing. Jones A Front Integr Neurosci; 2014; 8():96. PubMed ID: 25610378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]