These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36929377)

  • 21. X-ray dose reduction through adaptive exposure in fluoroscopic imaging.
    Burion S; Funk T
    J Vis Exp; 2011 Sep; (55):. PubMed ID: 21931295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography.
    Fritz S; Jones AK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Mar; 44(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24281685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigations of moving-slit radiography.
    Sorenson JA; Nelson JA
    Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):705-11. PubMed ID: 948607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. X-ray scatter correction algorithm for cone beam CT imaging.
    Ning R; Tang X; Conover D
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15191309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Simulator for X-ray images.
    Fanti V; Marzeddu R; Massazza G; Randaccio P; Brunetti A; Golosio B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):350-4. PubMed ID: 15933135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of polychromatic x-ray sources on helical, cone-beam computed tomography and dual-energy methods.
    Sidky EY; Zou Y; Pan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2293-303. PubMed ID: 15248578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Calculation of backscatter factors for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo methods.
    Petoussi-Henss N; Zankl M; Drexler G; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2237-50. PubMed ID: 9725601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
    Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laser alignment system for high-quality portable radiography.
    MacMahon H; Yasillo NJ; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1992 Jan; 12(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 1734456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
    Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of source to image distance on scattered radiation to the image receptor.
    Poletti J; McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Dec; 27(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 15712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An extended diffraction-enhanced imaging method for implementing multiple-image radiography.
    Chou CY; Anastasio MA; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Brey EM; Connor DM; Zhong Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1923-45. PubMed ID: 17374920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of dose reduction potential in scatter-corrected bedside chest radiography using U-net.
    Onodera S; Lee Y; Tanaka Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 32986183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical characteristics of a low-dose gas microstrip detector for orthopedic x-ray imaging.
    Després P; Beaudoin G; Gravel P; de Guise JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1193-204. PubMed ID: 15895603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.