These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36929598)

  • 1. Altered wing phenotypes of captive-bred migratory birds lower post-release fitness.
    Stojanovic D
    Ecol Lett; 2023 May; 26(5):789-796. PubMed ID: 36929598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The phenotypic costs of captivity.
    Crates R; Stojanovic D; Heinsohn R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Apr; 98(2):434-449. PubMed ID: 36341701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assortative mating among animals of captive and wild origin following experimental conservation releases.
    Slade B; Parrott ML; Paproth A; Magrath MJ; Gillespie GR; Jessop TS
    Biol Lett; 2014 Nov; 10(11):20140656. PubMed ID: 25411380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success.
    van Oosterhout C; Smith AM; Hänfling B; Ramnarine IW; Mohammed RS; Cable J
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1573-83. PubMed ID: 18173481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians.
    Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 18616746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term demographic and genetic effects of releasing captive-born individuals into the wild.
    Willoughby JR; Christie MR
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):377-388. PubMed ID: 30168872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild.
    Araki H; Cooper B; Blouin MS
    Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 19515651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedigree analysis reveals a generational decline in reproductive success of captive Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii): implications for captive management of threatened species.
    Farquharson KA; Hogg CJ; Grueber CE
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 28379457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Harding G; Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 26306460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of captivity on morphology: negligible changes in external morphology mask significant changes in internal morphology.
    Courtney Jones SK; Munn AJ; Byrne PG
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 May; 5(5):172470. PubMed ID: 29892434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species.
    Willoughby JR; Ivy JA; Lacy RC; Doyle JM; DeWoody JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175996. PubMed ID: 28423000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Captive Ancestry Upwardly Biases Estimates of Relative Reproductive Success.
    Willoughby JR; Christie MR
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):583-587. PubMed ID: 28499014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low Impact of Avian Pox on Captive-Bred Houbara Bustard Breeding Performance.
    Le Loc'h G; Souley MA; Bertagnoli S; Paul MC
    Front Vet Sci; 2017; 4():12. PubMed ID: 28243593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing generations in captivity is associated with increased vulnerability of Tasmanian devils to vehicle strike following release to the wild.
    Grueber CE; Reid-Wainscoat EE; Fox S; Belov K; Shier DM; Hogg CJ; Pemberton D
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2161. PubMed ID: 28526824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population correlates of rapid captive-induced maladaptation in a wild fish.
    Fraser DJ; Walker L; Yates MC; Marin K; Wood JLA; Bernos TA; Zastavniouk C
    Evol Appl; 2019 Aug; 12(7):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 31417616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fitness consequences of wildlife conservation translocations: a meta-analysis.
    Gross IP; Wilson AE; Wolak ME
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2024 Apr; 99(2):348-371. PubMed ID: 37844577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Captive-rearing of Gunnison sage-grouse from egg collection to adulthood to foster proactive conservation and recovery of a conservation-reliant species.
    Apa AD; Wiechman LA
    Zoo Biol; 2015; 34(5):438-52. PubMed ID: 26105557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early and accumulated experience shape migration and flight in Egyptian vultures.
    Efrat R; Hatzofe O; Mueller T; Sapir N; Berger-Tal O
    Curr Biol; 2023 Dec; 33(24):5526-5532.e4. PubMed ID: 38042150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What role does heritability play in transgenerational phenotypic responses to captivity? Implications for managing captive populations.
    Courtney Jones SK; Byrne PG
    Zoo Biol; 2017 Dec; 36(6):397-406. PubMed ID: 29193268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel holistic framework for genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Attard CR; Möller LM; Sasaki M; Hammer MP; Bice CM; Brauer CJ; Carvalho DC; Harris JO; Beheregaray LB
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1060-9. PubMed ID: 26892747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.